SciPost Submission Page

QuSpin: a Python Package for Dynamics and Exact Diagonalisation of Quantum Many Body Systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins

by Phillip Weinberg, Marin Bukov

Submission summary

As Contributors: Marin Bukov · Phillip Weinberg
Arxiv Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06782v2
Date accepted: 2019-08-05
Date submitted: 2019-07-03
Submitted by: Weinberg, Phillip
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Domain(s): Computational
Subject area: Condensed Matter Physics - Theory

Abstract

We present a major update to QuSpin, SciPostPhys.2.1.003 -- an open-source Python package for exact diagonalization and quantum dynamics of arbitrary boson, fermion and spin many-body systems, supporting the use of various (user-defined) symmetries in one and higher dimension and (imaginary) time evolution following a user-specified driving protocol. We explain how to use the new features of QuSpin using seven detailed examples of various complexity: (i) the transverse-field Ising chain and the Jordan-Wigner transformation, (ii) free particle systems: the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model, (iii) the many-body localized 1D Fermi-Hubbard model, (iv) the Bose-Hubbard model in a ladder geometry, (v) nonlinear (imaginary) time evolution and the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on a 1D lattice, (vi) integrability breaking and thermalizing dynamics in the translationally-invariant 2D transverse-field Ising model, and (vii) out-of-equilibrium Bose-Fermi mixtures. This easily accessible and user-friendly package can serve various purposes, including educational and cutting-edge experimental and theoretical research. The complete package documentation is available under http://weinbe58.github.io/QuSpin/index.html.

Current status:

Ontology / Topics

See full Ontology or Topics database.

Exact diagonalization Hubbard model Jordan-Wigner fermions/transformation Quantum many-body systems Transverse-field Ising chain

Author comments upon resubmission

We agree with most of the suggestions made by the referees, see the list of changes where we address all the points individually.

List of changes

Report 1:

Suggested changes:
1. The only point of improvement I see is to better comment on the parallel capabilities of the package which is not very clear from the text (there is only one remark on p22, and a few remarks on p 40 with reference to the Documentation C). It would be interesting to have a quick overview somewhere, to what extend the package can be used in parallel computations. (If certain parts do not support parallelism yet, that could be mentioned as possible feature in a future release).

We added an explicit page, and a corresponding example, to the online documentation which explains how to use the parallel capabilities. Additionally, starting from version 0.3.2, QuSpin has full OpenMP support. Because the paper is anyway long, we only mention the parallel capabilities in the Outlook section, and refer the interested readers to the online documentation for an example how to use them.

2. a few typos and minor points:
- p.8 title of Sec 2.2: write out SSH -> Su-Schrieffer-Heeger
- Figure 4 caption rhs: (b) local -> (b) Local
- p.24 after the first code block: adder -> ladder
- Fig.5: figure labels are borderline small
- p27, after code line 41: Hsmiltonian -> Hamiltonian
- p41, first paragraph: Linblad -> Lindblad

We corrected these typos.

Report 2:

Requested changes
The following changes are required:

1- In Fig. 2(a), it is necessary to state (in the figure or the text) that the energies are in the unit of J.

We added the clarification to the caption.

2- In Page 9, the first paragraph, the original SSH papers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 1698-701 1979, Phys. Rev. B 22 2099-111 1980, Phys. Rev. B 28 1138(E) 1983], highlighting the history of the model and the relevance to polyacetylene, must be cited. It is suggested to also reference a modern take on the model to highlight the concept of emergent topological edge states.

We added the references.

3- It is not clear which numerical routines exp_op class uses to estimate the matrix exponentials. If this class also employs Python's expm function, as used in other places in the paper, the authors need to state this more clearly. If exp_op class exploit other numerical methods, the authors need to mention accordingly and add appropriate references.

We added a footnote in Sec 2.2. to clarify this point.

4- In Page 2, the second paragraph, the authors correctly discuss that ED methods are still relevant to study certain dynamical problems. Another common and important use for ED calculations, in competition with highly-precise tensor network methods, is to derive the full or low-lying spectrum of frustrated Hamiltonians even on small system sizes. One needs to keep in mind that while employing tensor network approaches, although capable of studying very large system sizes, one requires to run a separate simulation to find the ground state and each individual excited state separately. I believe this other practical use of ED should be added to this paragraph.

We added this example to the discussion.

5- In Pages 20 and 21, the discussed coefficients relate to Code Snippet 1, and not to Fig. 1 as stated in the text.

We corrected this typo.

6- In Page 24, the sixth paragraph, the addition of at least one (original or review) reference covering Gross-Pitaevskii wave equations is necessary. Also, I like to suggest to put another reference covering the use of Gross-Pitaevskii equations, specifically, in nonlinear optics.

We added the requested references.

The following minor changes are suggested:

1- In Abstract, the authors appropriately specify the dimensions and/or lattice geometries of models in examples (iv) and (vi). The same can be also done for the models in other examples (e.g. using "Ising chain" instead of "Ising model"); especially, since mentioning the dimensionalities/geometries will reflect the degree of their complexity.

We included these clarifications.

2- In Abstract, the SSH abbreviation is used for the first time here without stating the full version. Nevertheless, I suggest avoiding the use of the short form of the model name in the abstract.

We agree to this comment and corrected the sentence.

4- In Page 3, the first paragraph, it is more appropriate to separate New Features into two groups as "major changes" and "other added features" (or any similar titles), as discussed in my Report, to highlight the importance of significant new changes marked as (i) and (ii).

We decided to leave the text as it is, mainly because we keep adding new features to the package. To keep track of them, we now have a separate page on the documentation website, where we divide the newly introduced changes according to Improved Functionality and New Classes, Methods, and Functions.

5- The following is only a suggested change for the QuSpin core codes and not essentially relates the manuscript: as mentioned, the installation of the package is well-explained and rather straightforward by following the available guides and through the Python package manager Anaconda. However, the authors fail to address a seemingly common problem that I have faced during installation of QuSpin on several machines, i.e. the 'Permission denied' error while performing 'conda install -c weinbe58 quspin' (which perform several transactions at once). This would happen for any user with not enough permission in /address_to_anaconda directory and often cannot be fixed by changing umask settings (in addition, it is not recommended and useful to run anaconda with sudo). The solution is, of course, to simply run 'sudo chown user:user anaconda-dir/ -R' on all or relevant Anaconda directories.

In the online documentation, under Installation, we have put a paragraph on "Installing without sudo Privileges". The simplest way of doing it using anaconda is to create a new environment, where no 'sudo'-commands are required. If this fails, the user can install miniconda (a light but sufficient version of anaconda) in their home directory where they typically do have rights to install software programs, and then use miniconda.

6- There are no mentions of the available and important feature of Lanczos subspace diagonalization until the example in Sec. 2.5. It is suggested for this feature to be briefly discussed in the introduction.

While Lanczos is a substantial part of any ED method, we do not feel that we contribute in any way to these algorithms/methods. As we acknowledge throughout the text, we make use of Scipy routines for these Krylov methods and cite the relevant libraries. Scipy provides a decent discussion of these methods in their documentation. Since the paper is anyway long enough, we prefer to abstain from this discussion.

7- The abbreviation GS, standing for the ground state, is first used in Page 27 without stating the full version. Nevertheless, I suggest avoiding the use of GS at any place.

We incorporated this suggestion.

8- Since the provided guideline for how to run Python codes is so brief (basically a one-liner as 'python test.py'), Appendix B seems very unnecessary. This one line can be then added to Appendix A.

We agree to this point. Yet, we believe that there is no harm in leaving these instructions for the benefit of new-comers to python.

9- Often when the authors discuss the spin-1/2 transverse-field Ising model on a chain (one-dimensional) or in two dimensions, they do not clearly state which models they really mean, e.g. see the last paragraph of Page 30. I encourage the authors to pay more attention to specifying the dimensionality of the Ising model.

We clarified the last paragraph of Page 30 and fixed the wording to make it less confusing.

10- In Sec. 2.6, it is never explicitly mentioned that the Ising model of the interest is on a square lattice. It would be useful to add this information to the beginning of the section.

We added this information to the text.

11- The abbreviation DM, standing for the density matrix, is first used in Page 40 without stating the full version. Nevertheless, I suggest avoiding the use of DM at any place.

We removed this abbreviation.


Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 2 on 2019-7-31 Invited Report

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1804.06782v2, delivered 2019-07-31, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1085

Report

The authors have revised their paper according to the suggested points of improvements, and I can thus recommend publication of this manuscript in SciPost in its present form (after correcting the typos listed below).

Typos:
page 8 section title 2.2: "Su-Sschrieffer-Heeger" -> "Su-Schrieffer-Heeger"
page 42 second line: "GIthub" -> "Github"

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author Phillip Weinberg on 2019-08-01
(in reply to Report 2 on 2019-07-31)
Category:
remark

I have fixed the typos and replaced the preprint on Arxiv.

Report 1 by Seyed Nariman Saadatmand on 2019-7-17 Invited Report

  • Cite as: Seyed Nariman Saadatmand, Report on arXiv:1804.06782v2, delivered 2019-07-17, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1065

Report

In the resubmission, the authors accurately implement a number of changes to address most of the issues raised in my previous report, and also raised by the other referee. In a few minor cases, they have decided to leave the text as it was in the first version, however, their provided reasoning is satisfactory for me.

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment