SciPost Submission Page
Sailing past the End of the World and discovering the Island
by Tarek Anous, Marco Meineri, Pietro Pelliconi, Julian Sonner
|As Contributors:||Tarek Anous · Pietro Pelliconi|
|Arxiv Link:||https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11718v2 (pdf)|
|Date submitted:||2022-05-09 14:23|
|Submitted by:||Pelliconi, Pietro|
|Submitted to:||SciPost Physics|
Large black holes in anti-de Sitter space have positive specific heat and do not evaporate. In order to mimic the behavior of evaporating black holes, one may couple the system to an external bath. In this paper we explore a rich family of such models, namely ones obtained by coupling two holographic CFTs along a shared interface (ICFTs). We focus on the limit where the bulk solution is characterized by a thin brane separating the two individual duals. These systems may be interpreted in a double holographic way, where one integrates out the bath and ends up with a lower-dimensional gravitational braneworld dual to the interface degrees of freedom. Our setup has the advantage that all observables can be defined and calculated by only relying on standard rules of AdS/CFT. We exploit this to establish a number of general results, relying on a detailed analysis of the geodesics in the bulk. Firstly, we prove that the entropy of Hawking radiation in the braneworld is obtained by extremizing the generalized entropy, and moreover that at late times a so-called `island saddle' gives the dominant contribution. We also derive Takayanagi's prescription for calculating entanglement entropies in BCFTs as a limit of our ICFT results.
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
Report 2 by Jorrit Kruthoff on 2022-6-6 (Invited Report)
This manuscript considers the calculation of entanglement entropies in two conformal field theories joint through an interface. The interface is permeable and allows for information to be exchanged between the two sides. The authors consider the CFTs to be holographic, which results in a bulk theory that consists of two AdS spaces with different curvature radii separated by a thin brane. One can also consider integrating out the bulk AdS degrees of freedom so that one gets an effective gravitational theory on the brane. Using these three different perspectives, the authors are able to derive the island formula in the perspective with the gravitating brane just using standard rules for AdS/CFT.
The manuscript is clear and contains many explicit calculation. I think it is valuable to see how the island rule emerges from standard rules of AdS/CFT.
I think the manuscript should be published, but I had some questions purely for my own interest and it would be great if the authors could give some comments.
1) In your setup, can I think of the Page transition where the Hawking and replica saddle change dominance as the same as the transition for a two-interval entanglement entropy? If so, I find it amusing to see this so explicitly in your setup.
2) I was a bit confused to what extend you now have a setup that can go beyond the usual island rule because you can just use the standard AdS/CFT rules. Is it that you can consider more general states? It would be great if the authors could comment on this.
3) I know at least a subset of the authors is a de Sitter afficionado, so I was wondering whether this setup can also be used to study islands in cosmology. I guess there the derivation of the RT prescription is already conjectural, but nevertheless it would be interesting to study. Is the bulk now separated by a timelike brane in this case?
Anonymous Report 1 on 2022-5-31 (Invited Report)
1 - Gives intuitive arguments for prescriptions to calculate holographic BCFT and island contributions to entanglement
2 - Arguments rely on simple geometry
3 - Well written and pedagogical
4 - Clear figures
1 - Somewhat minimal variation on existing work in double holographic methods for entanglement entropies
2 - Restricted to 2D holographic CFTs and thin brane approximation
In this work, the authors construct holographic duals to two-dimensional “interface CFTs,” (ICFTs) which describe the coupling of two CFTs with large and potentially different central charges at an interface or defect. The gravitational picture is that of two patches of AdS_3 with potentially different radii (identified with the two different Brown-Henneaux central charges) which meet along a brane described by standard Israel-Lanczos matching conditions. These conditions lead to a transparent interface which allows for non-zero correlations between operators in the separate CFTs. The authors then proceed to describe a procedure for obtaining two-point functions of heavy operators and the entanglement entropy of subregions of the ICFTs, both of which are described by geodesics in the bulk. The necessary criteria they derive for such geodesics is that they must be continuous and normal to the brane at the bulk AdS interface. By then considering certain limits and interpretations of this setup, the authors explain the appearance of islands in the computation of the generalized entropy in AdS_2 and the resulting Page curve for evaporating black holes as well as the procedure for obtaining the entanglement entropy in a holographic BCFT. The most important point of the work is that the criteria for the geodesics with a thin brane interface follows from smoothness of the bulk and the well-established HRT procedure for entanglement entropy.
I find the paper to be well written and pedagogical. Furthermore, the use of AdS_3 allows the geodesics to be obtained from simple geometry, making the results clear and unobjectionable.
The obvious drawback, which the authors emphasize, is that AdS_3 is a special case of holography, where, in particular, some objections due to massive gravitons and braneworlds cannot be addressed. Nevertheless, because the results of the paper rely mostly on the HRT procedure, for which a proof exists in the literature, it is likely some version of their construction continues to hold in higher dimensions. This is important evidence for the applicability of the so-called island formula in higher dimensions. Another drawback, as the authors similarly point out, is that the coincidence of the RT procedure and the interface boundary conditions do not allow brane-localized degrees of freedom, though from the CFT point of view, such degrees of freedom should exist generically. Nevertheless, to address this in detail is likely beyond the scope of this work, though if the authors had any speculative ideas in this direction, I would be curious to hear them.
The paper needs some editing for typos and repeated words, for instance:
1 - on p.34, "in the large tension limit" is repeated
2- p.40 "at last" to "at least"