SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Searches for additional Higgs bosons decaying to tau leptons at the LHC

by Claudio Caputo

This is not the current version.

Submission summary

As Contributors: Claudio Caputo
Preprint link: scipost_201812_00043v1
Date submitted: 2018-12-21 01:00
Submitted by: Caputo, Claudio
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 15th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (Amsterdam, 2018-09)
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
Approach: Experimental

Abstract

The searches for additional Higgs bosons decaying to tau leptons in scenarios beyond the standard model will be summarised, from the pp collision data collected by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at LHC Run-2.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted


Submission & Refereeing History

Resubmission scipost_201812_00043v2 on 11 January 2019

You are currently on this page

Submission scipost_201812_00043v1 on 21 December 2018

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 1 on 2019-1-11 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201812_00043v1, delivered 2019-01-11, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.788

Report

The report is clear and describes the current status of BSM Higgs searches at ATLAS and CMS very well. Content-wise the report is good, but the author has been asked to submit a revised version with a few spelling mistakes fixed. A summary of the suggested language changes is attached below.

Requested changes

L32 Plack -> Planck
L40 “with discovered Higgs” -> with the discovered Higgs
L52 For mass -> For masses
L53 plus is neutrino -> plus a neutrino
L54 for mass above -> for masses above
L74 tan b -> tan \beta
Caption Fig.1: I suggest to put in a semicolon after the production mechanisms, i.e. Gluon gluon fusion; (bottom left) bb-associated …
L80: 36 fb-1 is the luminosity corresponding to 2015+2016 data, while in the text it says 2016 only
L95: I think it should be called \tau_{h} misidentification, i.e. removing the reference to the visible components b/c the hadronic tau decay is misidentified and the visible component hasn’t been introduced
L96 respectively -> respectively, (comma)
L100 fraction for to two -> fraction for the two
Fig.2/3: Could you swap the top and bottom row to be consistent with the caption and the order in the text?
L107 If H+- mass -> If the H+- mass
L110 plus is neutrino -> plus a neutrino
L110 If H+- mass -> If the H+- mass
L113 10-15%
L120 & L121Again only the 2016 data is mentioned while it is the data until end of 2016
L148 Decay chain -> Decay chains
L150 What is meant by “Four different type”? I think there is something missing here
L166 This variable use -> This variables uses or even better This variable exploits
L166 kinematic -> kinematics
L169 Z\tott -> Z\to\tau\tau
L199 final state -> final states
L204 two analysis -> two analyses
L207 limits are down to -> limits lower to or limits reduce to
L212 2016 data -> 2015+2016 data

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment