SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

The unitary representations of the Poincar\'e group in any spacetime dimension

by Xavier Bekaert and Nicolas Boulanger

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Nicolas Boulanger
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202012_00021v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2020-12-31 12:19
Submitted by: Boulanger, Nicolas
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Lecture Notes
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Representation Theory
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
  • Mathematical Physics
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

An extensive group-theoretical treatment of linear relativistic field equations on Minkowski spacetime of arbitrary dimension $D\geqslant 3$ is presented. An exhaustive treatment is performed of the two most important classes of unitary irreducible representations of the Poincar\'e group, corresponding to massive and massless fundamental particles. Covariant field equations are given for each unitary irreducible representation of the Poincar\'e group with non-negative mass-squared.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 3 on 2021-3-5 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202012_00021v1, delivered 2021-03-05, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2650

Strengths

1- Clear and well structured introduction to unitary representation of the Poincaré group in any dimensions (pedagogical introductions usually only deal with the D=4 case);
2- Useful review of tensorial representations, including remarks on branching rules that often do not appear in introductory texts;
3- Precise references allow to complete the steps that are not discussed in detail in the text.

Weaknesses

1- some additional remarks on 3D infinite-spin representations could have been added in Appendix B, in order to develop this case, whose analysis is rather recent, as the other ones reviewed in the text.

Report

The manuscript is an improved version of a review posted on the ArXiv by the authors as hep-th/0611263. The main text contains only minor modifications with respect to the preprint: for instance, a couple of remarks have been added at pag. 6, the notation at the beginning of section 4.4 has been clarified and a reference on a review on the recent developments on infinite-spin representations has been added to section 5.3.2. The main addition are the two appendices: Appendix A reviews a method to build massless representations of the Poincaré group in any dimensions developed by Siegel and Zwiebach, implementing the condition that the translation generators of the little group act trivially on physical states by means of a covariant constraint. Appendix B reviews instead the classification of unitary representations of the Poincaré group in D=3.
The original preprint was already an excellent review, introducing in a complete although pedagogical way the unitary representations of the Poincaré group in D>3, while also gathering a lot of useful material on tensorial representations. Appendix B is an important addition to the original text, including references on recent developments on fractional and infinite spin representations. Given the peculiarities of the 3D setup, it doesn't hurt if the material has been collected in an appendix rather than being included in the main text. Appendix A is an interesting bonus, recalling a not-so-well-known method that is not mentioned in any of the textbooks I am familiar with. All in all, I think that the manuscript is an excellent review and, given that it only appeared in the form of ArXiv preprint, I suggest its publication in SciPost.

  • validity: top
  • significance: top
  • originality: high
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: excellent

Author:  Nicolas Boulanger  on 2021-03-18  [id 1317]

(in reply to Report 3 on 2021-03-05)

Dear Referee,

We thank you for your careful report and appreciation of our work.
Concerning the 3D infinite-spin case: To the best of our knowledge, the only reference on this case is the one that we mentioned. We believe that some more work must be done in order to validate/complete/correct this work. Indeed, this case is not sufficiently well understood to deserve a review at this stage. At least, this is our opinion.

Best regards

Report 2 by Sergei Kuzenko on 2021-2-14 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Sergei Kuzenko, Report on arXiv:scipost_202012_00021v1, delivered 2021-02-14, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2554

Report

This is an important review paper devoted to field realisations of the unitary representations of the Poincar\'e group in diverse dimensions. Its first version appeared in the hep-th archive, hep-th/0611263. Since then it has generated almost 100 citations, which shows that many members of the higher-spin community have used this review in their research. As compared with the 2006 preprint, the current manuscript contains two new appendices A and B, as well as additional references. These additions are natural and useful.

I do not hesitate to recommend this review for publication. However, I have a few minor suggestions that the authors might consider to implement or not. (All suggestions are optional.)

Attachment


  • validity: top
  • significance: top
  • originality: top
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: perfect

Author:  Nicolas Boulanger  on 2021-03-18  [id 1316]

(in reply to Report 2 by Sergei Kuzenko on 2021-02-14)
Category:
answer to question

Dear Sergei,

We thank you for your pedagogical comments that will improve the quality of our lecture notes. We also thank you for pointing out to us the two references on the 3D massive case for (half)-integer spins. We have now cited these two papers in our new version, in due place, after Eq. (94).
Concerning your comments and numerous references on the supersymmetric case, we understand you point and therefore suppressed the reference to Bergshoeff et al., since supersymmetry is absolutely not the point of our review and we do not want to enter into this field. It was indeed awkward to refer to this paper and not to all the others.

Best regards

Anonymous Report 1 on 2021-2-1 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202012_00021v1, delivered 2021-02-01, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2490

Strengths

The review is well organized, systematic and clearly written.

Weaknesses

-

Report

The review by Bekaert and Boulanger is slightly extended version of their
article which appeared many years ago in arxives (Useful appendices A and B added). By now this review is well known to experts in field and I'm happy to provide report on this nice review.

First, in Secs 2, 3, and 4 the Authors provide review of UIR of the Poincare group, linear, and orthogonal groups. In those sections the interested
reader will find many interesting facts which are relevant for discussion of relativistic equations. In Sec. 5, the Authors review relativistic field equations. They provide the systematic step by step procedure for building covariant equations of motion associated massive and massless UIR of the Poincare group. The equations are given in (60), (61). The equations are given in terms of field strengths (and therefore does not require discussion of gauge symmetries). Though in the Abstract of the review the Authors mention UIR only with non-negative mass-squared, they present in Sec. 5 their interesting results for so called continuous spin field (massless and massive). To my opinion these results for equations (and constraints) of continuous spin field are very important for future development of the this theme.

The review is well organized, systematic and clearly written. To my opinion all relevant references are mentioned in the list of References.

I strongly recommend the article by Bekaert and Boulanger for publication in SciPost.

Requested changes

-

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: perfect

Author:  Nicolas Boulanger  on 2021-02-13  [id 1235]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2021-02-01)
Category:
remark

We thank the referee for his/her kind appreciation of our lecture notes.
With our best regards.

Login to report or comment