SciPost Submission Page
Underground laboratories
by Aldo Ianni
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Aldo Ianni |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202210_00020v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2022-10-03 12:36 |
| Submitted by: | Ianni, Aldo |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 14th International Conference on Identification of Dark Matter (IDM2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
A brief review on underground laboratories at the time of IDM 2022 is reported. General characteristics of these research infrastructures are discussed and a few highlights from different laboratories are reported. The idea of networking between underground laboratories is discussed.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 1 on 2022-10-19 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202210_00020v1, delivered 2022-10-19, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5928
Report
In this proceeding author does a brief review of underground laboratories at the time of the conferences and the status of them. The manuscript is clearly written and well organised. It is also suitably formatted for publication.
I recommend the manuscript for publication with some recommendations.
Requested changes
- Fig 1 should be explained. The difference between black and grey is not strong enough.
- Confusion through the paper - how many labs are there.
- P.2 “..some 76….” Some or 76?
- Be consistent “electro-forming” or “e-forming”
- P.3 “NOW is a ISO6 Rn-free clean…” -> NOA?
- Add links to the labs (websites, papers or so)
- Fig.2 15 existing labs, in introduction 13.
- More explanations for Fig.3
- Ref 7-10 provide other references if possible.