SciPost Submission Page
Measuring Chern numbers in Hofstadter strips
by Samuel Mugel, Alexandre Dauphin, Pietro Massignan, Leticia Tarruell, Maciej Lewenstein, Carlos Lobo, Alessio Celi
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as Contributors):  Alessio Celi · Alexandre Dauphin · Pietro Massignan · Samuel Mugel · Leticia Tarruell 
Submission information  

Arxiv Link:  http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04676v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20170519 02:00 
Submitted by:  Celi, Alessio 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approach:  Theoretical 
Abstract
Topologically nontrivial Hamiltonians with periodic boundary conditions are characterized by strictly quantized invariants. Open questions and fundamental challenges concern their existence, and the possibility of measuring them in systems with open boundary conditions and limited spatial extension. Here, we consider transport in Hofstadter strips, that is, twodimensional lattices pierced by a uniform magnetic flux which extend over few sites in one of the spatial dimensions. As we show, an atomic wavepacket exhibits a transverse displacement under the action of a weak constant force. After one Bloch oscillation, this displacement approaches the quantized Chern number of the periodic system in the limit of vanishing tunneling along the transverse direction. We further demonstrate that this scheme is able to map out the Chern number of ground and excited bands, and we investigate the robustness of the method in presence of both disorder and harmonic trapping. Our results prove that topological invariants can be measured in Hofstadter strips with open boundary conditions and as few as three sites along one direction.
Current status:
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2017621 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1705.04676v1, delivered 20170621, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.172
Strengths
1. The authors propose a novel way to extract the topological Chern number from the transport of a wavepacket in a narrow Hofstadter strip. This is a very timely and interesting proposal, which opens up new perspectives for measuring topological invariants in small systems.
2. This proposal seems realistic from an experimental pointofview, and it nicely exploits the advantages of using synthetic dimensions in ultracold atoms. The authors also support their proposal by discussing the robustness of their method under harmonic trapping and disorder.
3. This paper is clearly explained and should be accessible to many people in the field. It also presents an understanding of Chern number physics which is quite intuitive while also being complementary to the current literature.
4. The strength of this method is further demonstrated by its application to measure higher Chern numbers and to even beat the FHS algorithm, which is a much used tool in the field.
Weaknesses
1. There are a few issues that need to be clarified within the manuscript. These are listed as Requested Changes below.
Report
In this paper, the authors propose to measure topological Chern numbers from the dynamics of a wavepacket in a narrow Hofstadter strip: a twodimensional lattice, pierced by a uniform magnetic flux, which is restricted to only a few sites along one of the spatial directions. This proposal is directly relevant to cuttingedge ultracold gas experiments on socalled synthetic dimensions built out of internal atomic states. Due to practical limitations on the number of internal atomic states coupled, these experiments realised Hofstadter strips and explored quantum Hall edge physics; this paper now proposes how to go further to also probe the topological bulk properties associated with a fullyextended 2D system. This is therefore a timely and interesting proposal, which can be helpful to experimentalists in the field.
Overall, this paper is wellwritten, accessible and wellexplained. The authors have also cited widely, so that I think this paper can also serve as a valuable starting point for an interested reader to explore the rest of the field. I recommend publication of this paper after a few small issues, listed in Requested Changes, have been resolved.
Requested changes
1. When introducing synthetic lattices on pg. 2, the authors specify "systems where particles have D spatial degrees of freedom and an extra synthetic dimension" but then later in the paragraph talk about "4D models", which implies another definition of "D"?
2. Refs. [4547] are cited as experiments on pg. 2, but these are theoretical proposals. I would recommend adding these instead to "...optical resonators [49]".
2. In Figure 1a) the blue arrow is very hard to see. I would also suggest adding axes labels for Fig 1.b) to be clear. It would also be helpful to the reader to explain the coloring of different sites in Fig. 1b).
3. As a question to the authors: how can we see that all quasimomentum states are populated equally over this definition of a period of the force (Eq. 10)? From Section II B and as implied by Fig. 3, the chosen Brillouin zone is $(2 \pi)/d \times (2 \pi/q d)$ along $k_x$ and $k_y$ respectively, which implies that you need to wait $T=2 \pi \hbar / d F_x$ to change $k_x$ by $2\pi$ and to sweep through the whole MBZ?
4. Could the authors please comment e.g. in Sec IV A on how they choose the force relative to the hybridisation gap? What size is the hybridisation gap here?
5. In Sec IV A, the authors say "the Hamiltonian with open boundary conditions and zero force, Eq. (3)". Do they mean Eq. 1?
6. Could the authors comment on how, when they project the evolved state on the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian with open boundary conditions, they make the distinction between band and gap states in Fig 4 b)?
7. In Sec. IV C1, the authors refer to "point A in Fig. 2a" but I do not see point A in this figure?
8. What is the strength of the force used in Section IV D? In the inset of Fig. 7, the hybridisation gap looks very close to the energy band gap so it is possible to chose a good value for the force between these limits?
9. In Fig. 7, I am curious about the identification of "well localised edge states crossing at $k_x = 3 \pi / 5d$": according to the color scheme, I see that the state with a positive gradient is welllocalised at $<y>=2d$, but the state with a negative gradient does not seem to be localised as I would have expected around $<y>=2d$. Why can this second state be called an edge state?
10. Question to the authors: in Fig. 7 & 8, it is shown that the Chern number of the lowest band can be extracted even when the number of eigenstates is smaller than the number of bands in the corresponding extended model. If instead the experiment was started from the minimum at $k_x=4 \pi/5d$ then would this still work? Could the authors comment on how general these results are expected to be?
Anonymous Report 1 on 2017611 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1705.04676v1, delivered 20170611, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.163
Strengths
1. The authors propose and analyse a novel method enabling to determine topological properties of the bulk by measuring the dynamics of an wavepacket in a Hofstadter stripe.
2. This is can be useful, e.g., to cold atom experiments where the magnetic flux can be produced using synthetic dimensions. In that case the stripe naturally appears, because the synthetic dimension extends over a limited number of sites.
Weaknesses
1. The manuscript deals only with the single particle physics. I suppose the manybody aspects of this method will be studied later on, as in the Concluding Section VI it is written:
"Another interesting direction is to analyze the effect of strong interactions on our protocol [60, 69], specially in view of the recent theoretical interest on interacting phases and Laughlinlike states in real and synthetic ultracold atom ladders [97–100]."
Report
The authors consider the transport of particles in twodimensional lattices affected by a uniform magnetic. It is shown that the topological properties of the bulk can be determined from the dynamics of an wavepacket in a Hofstadter stripe taken from the bulk. This is relevant for example to cold atom experiments where the magnetic flux can be produced using synthetic dimensions. In that case the stripe naturally appears, because the synthetic dimension extends over a limited number of sites.
The authors have explored the dynamics of a wavepacket which is initially localized in the transverse direction of the stripe. In the context of the semisynthetic lattices such a wavepacket can be produced by initially placing atoms in a single internal state: this corresponds to a perfect localization in the synthetic dimension. Subsequently a weak constant force is applied in the real dimension leading to the Bloch oscillations. It is shown that after one Bloch cycle, the wavepacket acquires a displacement in the transverse (synthetic) direction determined by the quantized Chern number of the infinite system. The scheme enables to determine the Chern numbers of both the ground and excited bands. The robustness of the proposed method with respect to the disorder and harmonic trapping has also been investigated.
The paper is well written. I think it is an interesting work, which is relevant to the current experiments with cold atom, photonic and condensed matter systems. For example, applying the proposed method the Chern number of the bulk can be measured using the stripes containing as few as three sites in transverse direction. This could be very helpful in studying the semisynthetic ribbons. I recommend the manuscript to be published.
A minor remark. The method considered by the authors enables one to measure the first Chern number. The authors could discuss the extension of the method to measure of the second Chern number. In the last sentence of the Concluding Section VI there is some hint in this direction, but the authors could be more explicit.
Requested changes
See the end of the Report
Author: Alessio Celi on 20170615 [id 144]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20170611)We thank the Referee for the interest in our work.
The suggestion of the Referee of discussing the extension of our method to the measurement of the 2nd Chern is very interesting and timing. We will certainly comment more on this point in the conclusions in the revision of the manuscript. We will do it also in relation to the very recent experiment in Bloch group where the 2nd Chern number is measured through a 2D Thouless pump, experiment appeared little after the submission of the present manuscript.