SciPost Submission Page
Thermal Decay without Information Loss in Horizonless Microstate Geometries
by Iosif Bena, Pierre Heidmann, Ruben Monten, Nicholas P. Warner
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Ruben Monten |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05194v2 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | Nov. 5, 2019 |
| Date submitted: | Oct. 25, 2019, 2 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Monten, Ruben |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We develop a new hybrid WKB technique to compute boundary-to-boundary scalar Green functions in asymptotically-AdS backgrounds in which the scalar wave equation is separable and is explicitly solvable in the asymptotic region. We apply this technique to a family of six-dimensional 18-BPS asymptotically AdS3×S3 horizonless geometries that have the same charges and angular momenta as a D1-D5-P black hole with a large horizon area. At large and intermediate distances, these geometries very closely approximate the extremal-BTZ×S3 geometry of the black hole, but instead of having an event horizon, these geometries have a smooth highly-redshifted global-AdS3×S3 cap in the IR. We show that the response function of a scalar probe, in momentum space, is essentially given by the pole structure of the highly-redshifted global-AdS3 modulated by the BTZ response function. In position space, this translates into a sharp exponential black-hole-like decay for times shorter than N1N5, followed by the emergence of evenly spaced "echoes from the cap," with period ∼N1N5. Our result shows that horizonless microstate geometries can have the same thermal decay as black holes without the associated information loss.
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
We have:
- corrected misprints such as Schrödinger (p.9 and onward),
- replaced the notation ΨE by Ψex in order to avoid notational conflict with other conventions (eq(2.12) and onward),
- addressed the confusing statement x≪∞ (p.11),
- added the definitions of the Airy functions (p.11),
- explained the statement that JR=1/2 is the minimal value (p.27),
- commented briefly on the difficulty extending our method to flat space superstrata (p.5),
- added references to the Virgo/LIGO and Event Horizon Telescope publications.
Published as SciPost Phys. 7, 063 (2019)