SciPost Submission Page
The eikonal model of reactions involving exotic nuclei; Roy Glauber's legacy in today's nuclear physics
by Pierre Capel
- Published as SciPost Phys. Proc. 3, 017 (2020)
|As Contributors:||Pierre Capel|
|Arxiv Link:||https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11446v2 (pdf)|
|Date submitted:||2019-12-17 01:00|
|Submitted by:||Capel, Pierre|
|Submitted to:||SciPost Physics Proceedings|
|Proceedings issue:||24th European Few Body Conference (University of Surrey, U.K.)|
|Subject area:||Nuclear Physics - Theory|
In this contribution, the eikonal approximation developed by Roy Glauber to describe high-energy quantum collisions is presented. This approximation has been-and still is-extensively used to analyse reaction measurements performed to study the structure of nuclei far from stability. This presentation focuses more particularly on the application of the eikonal approximation to the study of halo nuclei in modern nuclear physics. To emphasise Roy Glauber's legacy in today's nuclear physics, recent extensions of this model are reviewed.
Published as SciPost Phys. Proc. 3, 017 (2020)
Author comments upon resubmission
I would like to thank the Referee for his/her careful review of my manuscript. I have addressed all the issues raised in his/her report.
List of changes
p.1: "lose" corrected into "loose".
p.1: one before last sentence rephrased to avoid "efficiently".
p.1, last sentence: "nucleus" corrected into "nuclei,"
p.2, second sentence of second paragraph: "like" changed into "such as".
p.2, second sentence of third paragraph: "efficient" changed into "effective".
p.5, first sentence of 2nd paragraph: "as in" corrected into "than to".
p.5, line following (12): "at" changed into "in".
p.6, last sentence of 1st paragraph: "Efficient" replaced by "Extensive".
p.6, one before last sentence of the 2nd paragraph: "former" corrected by "first of these".
p.7, last line of one before last paragraph: "perfectly matches" replaced by "agrees very well with"
p.8, last line of Sec.4.1: "dire need" replaced by "necessity"
p.8, 2nd sentence of 2nd paragraph of Sec.4.2: "excellent" replaced by "good"
p.10, last line of 2nd paragraph: "peeking" corrected into "peaking"
p.10, three lines below (14): "efficiently" removed
p.10, first line of last paragraph of Sec.4.3: "is it" corrected into "it is"
p.11, first line of Sec.5: "efficiently" removed
p.11, 4th sentence of 2nd paragraph of Sec.5 rephrased.
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page