SciPost Submission Page
"Spectrally gapped" random walks on networks: a Mean First Passage Time formula
by Silvia Bartolucci, Fabio Caccioli, Francesco Caravelli, Pierpaolo Vivo
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Francesco Caravelli · Pierpaolo Vivo |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02730v3 (pdf) |
Date accepted: | 2021-09-29 |
Date submitted: | 2021-08-18 08:47 |
Submitted by: | Vivo, Pierpaolo |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We derive an approximate but explicit formula for the Mean First Passage Time of a random walker between a source and a target node of a directed and weighted network. The formula does not require any matrix inversion, and it takes as only input the transition probabilities into the target node. It is derived from the calculation of the average resolvent of a deformed ensemble of random sub-stochastic matrices $H=\langle H\rangle +\delta H$, with $\langle H\rangle$ rank-$1$ and non-negative. The accuracy of the formula depends on the spectral gap of the reduced transition matrix, and it is tested numerically on several instances of (weighted) networks away from the high sparsity regime, with an excellent agreement.
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
See pdf attached as a reply to the Referees' comments.
Published as SciPost Phys. 11, 088 (2021)
Reports on this Submission
Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2021-9-14 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2106.02730v3, delivered 2021-09-14, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3530
Strengths
1. analytical formula for the MFPT on dense weighted graphs, obtained avoiding matrix inversion.
2. numerical validation of the results
3. validity limits are well established and verified numerically.
Weaknesses
1. not so useful on sparse graphs, where the main assumptions of the calculation are not satisfied
Report
The Authors have seriously considered my previous comments and revised the manuscript accordingly. In my opinion, the paper was already well written and of certain interest for a broad audience of readers and after revision now meets the acceptance criteria on SciPost. I recommend it for publication in the current form.
Requested changes
none
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2021-9-3 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2106.02730v3, delivered 2021-09-03, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3490
Strengths
1. explicit formula to compute MFPT on weighted graphs
2. the formula requires local calculations, no matrix inversion which can be computationally cumbersome and numerically inaccurate.
3. validity limits are theoretically established exploiting random matrix theory and replica calculations
Weaknesses
1. the proposed formula is an approximation that only works on moderately dense graphs, there is no simple way to link the inaccuracy on sparse graphs with their local structural properties (average degree, etc.).
Report
The authors have considered satisfactorily all the comments raised by the referees and the paper should be accepted without further delay.
Requested changes
None