SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

The pion-photon transition form factor at two loops in QCD

by Jing Gao, Tobias Huber, Yao Ji, Yu-Ming Wang

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Tobias Huber
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14776v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2022-02-28
Date submitted: 2021-10-29 16:20
Submitted by: Huber, Tobias
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: 15th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections: Applications of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (RADCOR2021)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Theoretical, Phenomenological

Abstract

We report on the fully analytic calculation of the leading-power contribution to the photon-pion transition form factor $\gamma \, \gamma^{\ast} \to \pi^0$ at two loops in QCD. The applied techniques are based on hard-collinear factorization, together with modern multi-loop methods. We focus both, on the technical details such as the treatment of evanescent operators, and the phenomenological implications. Our results indicate that the two-loop correction is numerically comparable to the one-loop effect in the same kinematic domain. We also demonstrate that our results will play a key role in disentangling various models for the twist-two pion distribution amplitude thanks to the envisaged precision at Belle II.

Published as SciPost Phys. Proc. 7, 022 (2022)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2021-11-27 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The article reports on the work presented at RADCOR/LoopFest 2021. It fulfills all the requirements for publication in SciPost Proceedings.

Weaknesses

None.

Report

The article reports on the work presented at RADCOR/LoopFest 2021. It fulfills all the requirements for publication in SciPost Proceedings and therefore we recommend its publication.

Requested changes

None.

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment