SciPost Submission Page
String correlators on $\text{AdS}_3$: Analytic structure and dual CFT
by Andrea Dei, Lorenz Eberhardt
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Andrea Dei · Lorenz Eberhardt |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13264v2 (pdf) |
Date accepted: | 2022-08-16 |
Date submitted: | 2022-07-26 09:31 |
Submitted by: | Dei, Andrea |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We continue our study of string correlators on Euclidean $\text{AdS}_3$ with pure NS-NS flux. The worldsheet and spacetime correlators have a rich analytic structure, which we analyse completely for genus 0 four-point functions. We show that correlators exhibit a simple behaviour near their singularities. The spacetime correlators are meromorphic functions in the $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$-spins, whose pole structure is shown to agree with the prediction of a recent proposal for the dual $\text{CFT}_2$. Moreover, we also compute the residues of the spacetime correlators for some of the poles exactly and find again a perfect match with the proposal for the dual $\text{CFT}_2$, thereby checking the duality for some non-trivial four-point functions exactly. Our computations simplify drastically in the tensionless limit of $\mathrm{AdS}_3 \times \mathrm{S}^3 \times \mathbb{T}^4$ where the behaviour near the poles gives in fact the exact answer. This paper is the third in a series with several installments.
List of changes
A detailed list of all the changes can be found in the comment to the referee's report.
Published as SciPost Phys. 13, 053 (2022)
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Sylvain Ribault (Referee 1) on 2022-8-7 (Invited Report)
Report
In the second version of this article, a number of points have been clarified following my suggestions. Some other suggestions were not followed, in which case the authors have adequately explained why. Some other points are discussed in the author's reply but not in the article's text. It will be up to the curious reader to consult the discussion on the journal website.
I have no further changes to suggest.