SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Analogue viscous current flow near the onset of superconductivity

by Koushik Ganesan, Andrew Lucas

This is not the latest submitted version.

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Andrew Lucas
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06567v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2022-10-05 15:08
Submitted by: Lucas, Andrew
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Spatially resolved transport in two-dimensional quantum materials can reveal dynamics which is invisible in conventional bulk transport measurements. We predict striking patterns in spatially inhomogeneous transport just above the critical temperature in two-dimensional superconducting thin films, where electrical current will appear to flow as if it were a viscous fluid obeying the Navier-Stokes equations. Compared to viscous electron fluids in ultrapure metals such as graphene, this analogue viscous vortex fluid can exhibit a far more tunable crossover, as a function of temperature, from Ohmic to non-Ohmic transport, with the latter arising on increasingly large length scales close to the critical temperature. Experiments using nitrogen vacancy center magnetometry, or transport through patterned thin films, could reveal this analogue viscous flow in a wide variety of materials.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2022-10-20 (Invited Report)

Report

Like the other anonymous reviewer, I cannot go beyond Equation 1. How can one apply a spatially modulated electric field to a metal? The authors propose to apply an electric field with spatial periodicity. I am not aware of any previous implementation of this. Do the authors believe that this is feasible by current technology, or is it just a thought experiment?

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-10-16 (Invited Report)

Report

I got stuck at: "...we apply a small time-independent electric field E⃗ = Ey(k)e^ikx yˆ,...". If this is the only E-field present, then, by Faraday (I think), we have a steadily changing B-field, and the superconductor should "care" about that B-field. So it is not clear what the set-up is. We could make a steady-state like this with a strip and currents flowing across the strip from edge to edge (and nonuniform along the infinite direction of the strip). If that is what is intended it should be made explicit.

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment