SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Boundary condition and reflection anomaly in $2+1$ dimensions

by Jiunn-Wei Chen, Chang-Tse Hsieh, Ryutaro Matsudo

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Ryutaro Matsudo
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10845v3  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2024-07-24 05:17
Submitted by: Matsudo, Ryutaro
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

It is known that the $2+1$d single Majorana fermion theory has an anomaly of the reflection, which is canceled out when 16 copies of the theory are combined. Therefore, it is expected that the reflection symmetric boundary condition is impossible for one Majorana fermion, but possible for 16 Majorana fermions. In this paper, we consider a reflection symmetric boundary condition that varies at a single point, and find that there is a problem with one Majorana fermion. The problem is the absence of a corresponding outgoing wave to a specific incoming wave into the boundary, which leads to the non-conservation of the energy. For 16 Majorana fermions, it is possible to connect every incoming wave to an outgoing wave without breaking the reflection symmetry. In addition, we discuss the connection with the fermion-monopole scattering in $3+1$ dimensions.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

1) We added Eq.~(2.9) and sentences above it to explicitly indicate the action of the reflection on a Majorana fermion field.
2) We fixed the misuse of the symbol $N_f$ below the Eq. (2.17).
3) We corrected the sentence above (3.9).

Current status:
Voting in preparation

Login to report or comment