SciPost Submission Page
Deconfined pseudocriticality in a model spin-1 quantum antiferromagnet
by Vikas Vijigiri, Sumiran Pujari, Nisheeta Desai
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Sumiran Pujari · Vikas Vijigiri |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14254v3 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2024-12-02 16:23 |
Submitted by: | Vijigiri, Vikas |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Core |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approaches: | Theoretical, Computational |
Abstract
Berry phase interference arguments that underlie the theory of deconfined quantum criticality (DQC) for spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ antiferromagnets have also been invoked to allow for continuous transitions in spin-1 magnets including a N\'eel to (columnar) valence bond solid (cVBS) transition. We provide a microscopic model realization of this transition on the square lattice consisting of Heisenberg exchange ($J_H$) and biquadratic exchange ($J_B$) that favor a N\'eel phase, and a designed $Q$-term ($Q_B$) interaction which favors a cVBS through large-scale quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations. For $J_H=0$, this model is equivalent to the $SU(3)$ $JQ$ model with a N\'eel-cVBS transition that has been argued to be DQC through QMC. Upon turning on $J_H$ which brings down the symmetry to $SU(2)$, we find multiple signatures -- a single critical point, high quality collapse of correlation ratios and order parameters, "$U(1)$-symmetric" cVBS histograms and lack of double-peak in order parameter histograms for largest sizes studied near the critical point -- that are highly suggestive of a continuous transition scenario. However, Binder analysis finds negative dips that grow sub-extensively that we interpret as these transitions rather being pseudocritical. This along with recent results on spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ models suggests that deconfined pseudocriticality is the more generic scenario.
Anonymous on 2024-12-08 [id 5027]
Not in SciPost format. In particular, SciPost does not publish Supplementary material, i.e., this should either be integrated into the main text, as appendices, or separated from the manuscript. See https://scipost.org/SciPostPhysCore/authoring for more details.