Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Choose Your Diffusion: Efficient and flexible ways to accelerate the diffusion model in fast high energy physics simulation

by Cheng Jiang, Sitian Qian, Huilin Qu

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Cheng Jiang · Sitian Qian
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13162v2  (pdf)
Date accepted: May 26, 2025
Date submitted: April 15, 2025, 6:28 a.m.
Submitted by: Qian, Sitian
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Experimental, Computational, Phenomenological

Abstract

The diffusion model has demonstrated promising results in image generation, recently becoming mainstream and representing a notable advancement for many generative modeling tasks. Prior applications of the diffusion model for both fast event and detector simulation in high energy physics have shown exceptional performance, providing a viable solution to generate sufficient statistics within a constrained computational budget in preparation for the High Luminosity LHC. However, many of these applications suffer from slow generation with large sampling steps and face challenges in finding the optimal balance between sample quality and speed. The study focuses on the latest benchmark developments in efficient ODE/SDE-based samplers, schedulers, and fast convergence training techniques. We test on the public CaloChallenge and JetNet datasets with the designs implemented on the existing architecture, the performance of the generated classes surpass previous models, achieving significant speedup via various evaluation metrics.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

A set of changes is made:

  1. Adding a training detail subsection, as well as more training details in each experiments (e.g. uncertainties, detailed setups...)
  2. Adjusting a big bunch of captions, formulas and plots
  3. Rephrase sentences

Published as SciPost Phys. 18, 195 (2025)


Reports on this Submission

Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2025-5-2 (Invited Report)

Report

I am satisfied with the authors' changes and recommend the manuscript proceed to publication.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-4-22 (Invited Report)

Strengths

  1. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the impact of different sampling algorithms for diffusion based generative models. The authors assess how these choices impact sample quality and generation time.

  2. The authors show significant speedups in generation time with good quality as compared to the baseline sampling methods used in prior works

Report

The authors have improved the clarity and presentation of results from the previous version. They have also provided a more comprehensive study on the JetNet dataset adds strength to the paper. They have addressed the feedback from the first draft and I I am happy to recommend publication.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: reasonable

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-4-16 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors carefully considered all the criticism points raised in the first iteration of the review and greatly improved the results obtained in their research. I'm happy to support the publication of this work as is.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: good
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: good

Login to report or comment