SciPost Submission Page
3d gravity from Virasoro TQFT: Holography, wormholes and knots
by Scott Collier, Lorenz Eberhardt, Mengyang Zhang
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Scott Collier · Lorenz Eberhardt · Mengyang Zhang |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13900v2 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2024-03-19 15:22 |
Submitted by: | Collier, Scott |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We further develop the description of three-dimensional quantum gravity with negative cosmological constant in terms of Virasoro TQFT formulated in our previous paper arXiv:2304.13650. We compare the partition functions computed in the Virasoro TQFT formalism to the semiclassical evaluation of Euclidean gravity partition functions. This matching is highly non-trivial, but can be checked directly in some examples. We then showcase the formalism in action, by computing the gravity partition functions of many relevant topologies. For holographic applications, we focus on the partition functions of Euclidean multi-boundary wormholes with three-punctured spheres as boundaries. This precisely quantifies the higher moments of the structure constants in the proposed ensemble boundary dual and subjects the proposal to thorough checks. Finally, we investigate in detail the example of the figure eight knot complement as a hyperbolic 3-manifold. We show that the Virasoro TQFT partition function is identical to the partition function computed in Teichm\"uller theory, thus giving strong evidence for the equivalence of these TQFTs. We also show how to produce a large class of manifolds via Dehn surgery on the figure eight knot.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2024-5-27 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2401.13900v2, delivered 2024-05-27, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.9136
Strengths
1. Clearly written.
2. Many explicit examples, including various internal checks plus checks with existing results in the literature.
Weaknesses
/
Report
See attached.
Recommendation
Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)