SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Three Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nahm Sum Formulas

by Dongmin Gang, Heeyeon Kim, Byoungyoon Park, Spencer Stubbs

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Heeyeon Kim
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06081v3  (pdf)
Date accepted: Oct. 20, 2025
Date submitted: Oct. 2, 2025, 7:50 a.m.
Submitted by: Heeyeon Kim
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

It is known that a large class of characters of 2d conformal field theories (CFTs) can be written in the form of a Nahm sum. In \cite{Zagier:2007knq}, D. Zagier identified a list of Nahm sum expressions that are modular functions under a congruence subgroup of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ and can be thought of as candidates for characters of rational CFTs. Motivated by the observation that the same formulas appear as the half-indices of certain 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric gauge theories, we perform a general search over low-rank 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ abelian Chern-Simons matter theories which either flow to unitary TFTs or $\mathcal{N}=4$ rank-zero SCFTs in the infrared. These are exceptional classes of 3d theories, which are expected to support rational and $C_2$-cofinite chiral algebras on their boundary. We compare and contrast our results with Zagier's and comment on a possible generalization of Nahm's conjecture.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

pg2: Below eq (1.5), we added the phrase “under a particular choice of…”, to emphasize that this identification holds only under the specific choice of boundary conditions discussed in section 3.

pg7: added a new footnote 7 clarifying the comparison of conventions with reference [43], and explaining why the claim in that reference should be interpreted with care.

pg12: added new footnote 11 to explain once again the choice R_*(Phi)=0 in the context of the half-index calculation, as a part of super conformal boundary condition.

pg12: Below (3.35), added the sentence “Notice that…” to emphasize that K is the boundary anomaly coefficient under our convention eq (3.4).

In addition, we corrected several minor typographical errors.

Published as SciPost Phys. 19, 128 (2025)

Login to report or comment