Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Stability of the Higgs Potential in the Standard Model and Beyond

by Tom Steudtner

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Tom Steudtner
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09241v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2025-01-14
Date submitted: 2024-12-13 16:41
Submitted by: Steudtner, Tom
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 17th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics (TOP2024)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Theoretical, Phenomenological

Abstract

The question of stability of the Higgs potential in the Standard Model is revisited employing advanced theoretical precision and recent experimental results. We show that the top mass and strong coupling constants are key observables in order to reach or refute absolute stability. We highlight new physics scenarios that lead to a decisive stabilisation of the Higgs sector. These proceedings summarise findings first reported in~[1,2].

Current status:
Accepted in target Journal

Editorial decision: For Journal SciPost Physics Proceedings: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-1-8 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The works excel in their use of advanced theoretical precision and recent experimental results to address the stability of the Higgs potential, emphasizing the importance of top mass and strong coupling constants, and proposing new physics scenarios for stabilizing the Higgs sector.

Weaknesses

The works are limited by the experimental uncertainties in the top mass and strong coupling constant (well, it's not the weakness of the paper, though).

Report

I think that the article is worth publishing in the SciPost as it is.

Requested changes

None

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment