SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Differential cross section measurements of top quark pair production for variables of the dineutrino system with the CMS experiment

by Sandra Consuegra Rodríguez

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Sandra Consuegra Rodríguez
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14806v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: Sept. 23, 2025
Date submitted: Dec. 20, 2024, 12:37 p.m.
Submitted by: Sandra Consuegra Rodríguez
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 17th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics (TOP2024)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approach: Experimental

Abstract

Differential top quark pair cross sections are measured in the dilepton final state as a function of kinematic variables associated to the dineutrino system. The measurements are performed making use of the Run 2 dataset collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC collider, corresponding to proton-proton collisions recorded at center of mass energy of 13 TeV and an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The measured cross sections are found in agreement with theory predictions and Monte Carlo simulations of standard model processes.

Current status:
Accepted in target Journal

Editorial decision: For Journal SciPost Physics Proceedings: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-4-8 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The proceeding gives a concise summary of the CMS measurement of differential cross-sections of the di-neutrino system.

Weaknesses

None

Report

I believe that the journal's criteria have been met and is an ideal submission for SciPost Physics Proceedings.

Requested changes

I have no changes to request. The report is well-written, succinct, and covers previously peer-reviewed material.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: good
  • significance: low
  • originality: ok
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: perfect
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment