SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Synthetic Data Generation with Lorenzetti for Time Series Anomaly Detection in High-Energy Physics Calorimeters

by Laura Boggia, Bogdan Malaescu

This is not the latest submitted version.

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Laura Boggia
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07451v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: Nov. 4, 2025, 9:15 a.m.
Submitted by: Laura Boggia
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 2nd European AI for Fundamental Physics Conference (EuCAIFCon2025)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
Approaches: Experimental, Computational
Disclosure of Generative AI use

The author(s) disclose that the following generative AI tools have been used in the preparation of this submission:

ChatGPT (GPT-5 and GPT-4, free version) for suggestions regarding language for writing of the article.

Abstract

Anomaly detection in multivariate time series is crucial to ensure the quality of data coming from a physics experiment. Accurately identifying the moments when unexpected errors or defects occur is essential, yet challenging due to scarce labels, unknown anomaly types, and complex correlations across dimensions. To address the scarcity and unreliability of labelled data, we use the Lorenzetti Simulator to generate synthetic events with injected calorimeter anomalies. We then assess the sensitivity of several time series anomaly detection methods, including transformer-based and other deep learning models. The approach employed here is generic and applicable to different detector designs and defects.

Author comments upon resubmission

Hello,
This is the re-suvmitted version, taking into account the minor revision comments we received.
Thanks
Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-11-17 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have improved the submission and addressed most of the feedback from the first report (v1). I have just a few editorial suggestions for v2

Requested changes

Please double check the references: 1- Ref [8] appears to be a doctoral dissertation and should be stated as such. Please also add a bibliographic identifier or a link if possible 2- For some references the arXiv identifier appears twice. Sometimes the formatting is inconsistent (with/without prefix) 3- Ref [19] seems to have a broken link

Recommendation

Ask for minor revision

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment