SciPost Submission Page
The inclusive Higgs boson cross-section in gluon-gluon fusion in soft-virtual approximation at fourth order in QCD
by Goutam Das, Sven-Olaf Moch
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Goutam Das |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17413v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | Oct. 22, 2025, 3:52 p.m. |
| Submitted by: | Goutam Das |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Community Reports |
| for consideration in Collection: |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Phenomenological |
Abstract
We present precise results for the inclusive Higgs boson cross-section in gluon-gluon fusion at the LHC considering state-of-the-art fourth-order results in perturbative QCD arising from the dominant soft and virtual gluon emissions. Utilizing four-loop QCD results for the gluon-form factor, the splitting function and related anomalous dimensions, we study the effects of threshold enhanced soft gluon emissions and estimate their impact on the total cross-section at the fourth order. Our study highlights the role of these higher-order contributions in improving the perturbative convergence and in significantly reducing the renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties. The results provide strong evidence for the perturbative stability and reliability of Higgs boson cross-section predictions at the LHC, thereby reinforcing the robustness of theoretical inputs in precision Higgs phenomenology. We also provide cross-section predictions using a large set of available parton distribution functions and show that, together with the value of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(m_Z)$, they cause the largest residual uncertainty for the Higgs boson cross-section in gluon-gluon fusion.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report
Recommendation
Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)
Strengths
Weaknesses
Report
Requested changes
Given that it is difficult to quantify the accuracy of the soft-virtual-type approximations made, I would recommend including a statement that a check of the corrections of the complete soft-virtual corrections, or more terms in the threshold expansion, if not the entire exact N4LO corrections, would nevertheless be desirable to have.
Recommendation
Ask for minor revision

Author: Goutam Das on 2025-11-29 [id 6086]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2025-11-26)To address the referee's recommendation, the following change is made at the very end of the Conclusion.
"Nevertheless, obtaining the complete N4LO correction would be highly desirable, as it would improve the accuracy of the soft-virtual approximation at this order."
Anonymous on 2025-12-01 [id 6090]
(in reply to Goutam Das on 2025-11-29 [id 6086])Thank you for adding this sentence to the conclusion. Could you also add some clarification on whether there remains unknowns in the soft-virtual terms in your approximation? It seems to me that at least the delta(1-z) term may not yet be known completely from the input of splitting functions and form factor only.