SciPost Submission Page
Light sterile neutrinos: a critical overview
by Ivan Esteban
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Ivan Esteban |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_201810_00001v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2018-10-26 02:00 |
| Submitted by: | Esteban, Ivan |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | The 15th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (TAU2018) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approaches: | Experimental, Theoretical |
Abstract
Light sterile neutrinos, first proposed after the results of the LSND experiment, have been a polemical topic for the last decades after seemingly contradictory data appeared from different experiments. In this overview, I review the experimental hints that point towards sterile neutrinos as well as their statistical compatibility. Even though the muon neutrino disappearance experiments strongly rule out vanilla sterile neutrinos, each oscillation channel remains internally mostly consistent. In any case, in the near future a series of independent and precise experiments should finally settle down this issue.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2018-11-27 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201810_00001v1, delivered 2018-11-27, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.679
Strengths
This paper gives a superb overview over the hotly debated issue of sterile neutrinos. The author very nicely weights all evidence pro and contra. It is well written and clear.
Weaknesses
None.
Report
This paper gives a superb overview over the hotly debated issue of sterile neutrinos. The author very nicely weights all evidence pro and contra. It is well written and clear. I have one question to figure 7: the first two data points are both labelled GALLEX (51CR L = 1.9m), so what is different between these two points?
Requested changes
One typo on line 171: en -> an
Author: Ivan Esteban on 2018-11-28 [id 361]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2018-11-27)I gratefully thank the referee for his/her careful reading and comments. Answering the question, in Figure 7 the two GALLEX data points refer to measurements with two different 51Cr sources. The particular references for each measurement are
http://inspirehep.net/record/380797
http://inspirehep.net/record/451948