SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

A Toy Model of the Information Paradox in Empty Space

by Suvrat Raju

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Suvrat Raju
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_201904_00001v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2019-06-04
Date submitted: 2019-04-25 02:00
Submitted by: Raju, Suvrat
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

A sharp version of the information paradox involves a seeming violation of the monogamy of entanglement during black hole evaporation. We construct an analogous paradox in empty anti-de Sitter space. In a local quantum field theory, Bell correlations between operators localized in mutually spacelike regions are monogamous. We show, through a controlled calculation, that this property can be violated by an order-1 factor in a theory of gravity. This example demonstrates that what appears to be a violation of the monogamy of entanglement may just be a subtle violation of locality in quantum gravity.

Published as SciPost Phys. 6, 073 (2019)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2019-5-16 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201904_00001v1, delivered 2019-05-16, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.957

Report

I thank the author for their detailed response. The changes implemented address all of my comments and requested changes satisfactorily.

While I still have reservations about the usefulness of this (interesting) argument as a toy model for the information paradox, in the revised manuscript I am satisfied that the assumptions and key steps of the argument are stated much more clearly, enabling readers to draw their own conclusions.

I therefore recommend that this submission should be published in SciPost Physics.

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment