SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet with strong breathing anisotropy

by Saeed S. Jahromi, Román Orús, Didier Poilblanc, Frédéric Mila

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Saeed Jahromi · Didier Poilblanc
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202009_00020v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2020-12-24
Date submitted: 2020-09-23 16:34
Submitted by: Jahromi, Saeed
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Computational
Approaches: Theoretical, Computational

Abstract

We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ Heisenberg model with breathing anisotropy (i.e., with different coupling strength on the upward and downward triangles) on the kagome lattice. Our study relies on large scale tensor network simulations based on infinite projected entangled-pair state and infinite projected entangled-simplex state methods adapted to the kagome lattice. Our energy analysis suggests that the U(1) algebraic quantum spin-liquid (QSL) ground-state of the isotropic Heisenberg model is stable up to very large breathing anisotropy until it breaks down to a critical lattice-nematic phase that breaks rotational symmetry in real space through a first-order quantum phase transition. Our results also provide further insight into the recent experiment on vanadium oxyfluoride compounds which has been shown to be relevant platforms for realizing QSL in the presence of breathing anisotropy.

Author comments upon resubmission

Dear Editors of SciPost Physics,

Thank you for your recent correspondence and reports on our manuscript, “Spin-1/2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet with strong breathing anisotropy”. We thank both referees for their positive reports and for recommending the publication of our paper in SciPost Physics after minor revisions.

We have responded to all comments of the two referees and we would like to resubmit our paper. We hope that with this, our manuscript is ready for publication in SciPost Physics.

Please find a list of changes and responses to all referee's comments below.

Sincerely Yours,
The Authors

List of changes

-Fig 3 were modified in response to the request of the referees and energies from other studies were added to the figure
-Fi 7-(a) was added to the paper and Fig. 7-(b) has now been improved
-Fig 8-(a) was updated with more accurate energies and Fig. 8-(b) was added to the in response to the referees
- Fig-9,10 were added to the paper
-Relevant discussions in response to the referee’s remarks were added to the manuscript in particular to Sec. 5

Published as SciPost Phys. 9, 092 (2020)


Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 4) on 2020-12-19 (Invited Report)

Report

I am happy with author's responses and changes to the manuscript and recommend this manuscript for publication in SciPost.

  • validity: good
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: good

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2020-12-13 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have carefully addressed my questions, I happy to recommend the manuscript for publication.

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment