SciPost Submission Page
MuCap: Muon Capture on the Proton
by Malte Hildebrandt and Claude Petitjean
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Malte Hildebrandt |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | scipost_202101_00009v1 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2021-01-13 17:17 |
Submitted by: | Hildebrandt, Malte |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
Proceedings issue: | Review of Particle Physics at PSI (PSI2020) |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
The singlet muon capture rate $\Lambda_S$ on the proton $\mu^-\ p \to \nu_\mu n$ is determined in a high precision lifetime measurement. The main apparatus consists of a new hydrogen time projection chamber as muon detector, developed by PSI, surrounded by cylindrical wire chambers and a plastic scintillator hodoscope as electron detectors. $\Lambda_S$ is evaluated as the difference between the inverse $\mu\,p$ lifetime and that of the free $\mu^+$. The result $\Lambda_S^\text{MuCap} = (715.6 \pm 5.4^\text{stat} \pm 5.1^\text{sys})\,\text{s}^{-1}$ is in excellent agreement with the prediction of chiral perturbation theory $\Lambda_S^{\chi\text{PT}} = (715.4 \pm 6.9)\,\text{s}^{-1}$. From $\Lambda_S^\text{MuCap}$ a recent analysis derives for the induced pseudoscalar coupling $g^\text{MuCap}_p = 8.23 \pm 0.83$ whereas $\bar{g}^{\chi\text{PT}}_p = 8.25 \pm 0.25$.}
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2021-1-30 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202101_00009v1, delivered 2021-01-30, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2480
Report
This is a beautiful experiment and I recommend publication! I have only a few very minor and only formal suggestions for changes, see below
Requested changes
1) If one follows the the AIP Style manual, one should avoid to start a new sentence with a symbol or a number. So, one might change on line 11 ,,Lambda_s is evaluated... by e.g. ,,The parameter Lambda_s is evaluated ...
2) Line 20 g_p(??): One should correct this.
3) In the footnote on page 2: (??) , please correct.
4) The references [3,4] are mentioned on page 4 after reference [20] only. So, in the list of references, one should make the according changes.
Author: Malte Hildebrandt on 2021-01-31 [id 1192]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2021-01-30)Thank you very much for your careful reading of the manuscript and your feedback.
Concerning your remark 1)
Thank you very much for pointing this out. We will keep this in mind and will correct according to the main editor's recommendations.
Concerning your remarks 2) and 3)
This manuscript is not a "stand-alone" paper, but part of a special volume in SciPost on particle physics at the Paul Scherrer Institut. The two "(??)" refer to the theory chapter of this special volume which is not yet submitted. In the tex-file the references to the theory chapter are already included and consequently appear currently only as "(??)".
Concerning your remark 4)
The references [3, 4] are already cited on page 1 in line 23. We think, the sequence of the references is correct - actually it is done automatically by LaTex.
Thanks and best regards, Malte Hildebrandt