SciPost Submission Page
Is a Miracle-less WIMP Ruled Out?
by Jason Arakawa, Tim M. P. Tait
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Jason Arakawa · Tim Tait |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | scipost_202105_00018v1 (pdf) |
Date accepted: | July 5, 2021 |
Date submitted: | May 14, 2021, 12:45 a.m. |
Submitted by: | Arakawa, Jason |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approaches: | Theoretical, Phenomenological |
Abstract
We examine a real electroweak triplet scalar field as dark matter, abandoning the requirement that its relic abundance is determined through freeze out in a standard cosmological history (a situation which we refer to as a 'miracle-less WIMP'). We extract the bounds on such a particle from collider searches, searches for direct scattering with terrestrial targets, and searches for the indirect products of annihilation. Each type of search provides complementary information, and each is most effective in a different region of parameter space. LHC searches tend to be highly dependent on the mass of the SU(2) charged partner state, and are effective for very large or very tiny mass splitting between it and the neutral dark matter component. Direct searches are very effective at bounding the Higgs portal coupling, but ineffective once it falls below λeff≲10−3. Indirect searches suffer from large astrophysical uncertainties due to the backgrounds and J-factors, but do provide key information for ∼ 100 GeV to TeV masses. Synthesizing the allowed parameter space, this example of WIMP dark matter remains viable, but only in miracle-less regimes.
Published as SciPost Phys. 11, 019 (2021)
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2021-6-24 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202105_00018v1, delivered 2021-06-24, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3116
Strengths
1) The paper studies motivated physics beyond the standard model
2) The indirect detection analysis is very detailed
Weaknesses
1) The introduction of the higher-dimensional operator does not seem strongly motivated to be and it has a clear impact on the phenomenology
Report
The paper reads very well and everything is explained in a clear way. I believe the results are interesting enough to deserve to appear in the literature and I am happy to recommend this paper for publication.