SciPost Submission Page
CJ15 global PDF analysis with new electroweak data from the STAR and SeaQuest experiments
by Sanghwa Park, Alberto Accardi, Xiaoxian Jing, J.F. Owens
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Sanghwa Park |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202107_00030v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2021-07-19 23:04 |
| Submitted by: | Park, Sanghwa |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 28th Annual Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS) and Related Subjects (DIS2021) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
Abstract
We present updates to a recent CTEQ-Jefferson Lab (CJ) global analysis of parton distribution functions with a new set of electroweak data that provide unique access to quark flavor separation in the proton. In particular, recent $\boldsymbol W$ and $\boldsymbol Z$ boson measurements from the STAR experiment at RHIC put additional constraints on light quarks and antiquarks near the valence regime. The new measurement of the Drell-Yan lepton pair production ratio in $\boldsymbol{p+p}$ and $\boldsymbol{p+d}$ collisions by the SeaQuest experiment at Fermilab extends the large-$\boldsymbol x$ coverage of the previous E866 experiment and sheds new light on the light antiquarks distribution. In this report, the impact of these new data sets on parton distribution functions will be presented with emphasis given to the flavor asymmetry of the light antiquark sea at large values of the parton momentum $\boldsymbol x$.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-2-14 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202107_00030v1, delivered 2022-02-14, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.4419
Report
Very interesting result and recommend for immediate publication.
A few minor suggestions for during the editing/publication stage:
The figure indices in Fig . 1 and the associated description are slightly confusing. One could consider including (a), (b), (c), (d) on the plots or under the individual plots.
Fig.3, if the author could explain the uncertainty band, (theoretical + experimental + fitting) would help the general audience's understanding.