SciPost Submission Page
Exploring Neutrino Masses and Mixing in the Seesaw Model with $L_e-L_\tau$ Gauged Symmetry
by Papia Panda, Mitesh Kumar Behera, Priya Mishra, Shivaramakrishna Singirala, Rukmani Mohanta
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Papia Panda |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202111_00043v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2021-11-23 06:59 |
| Submitted by: | Panda, Papia |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 16th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (TAU2021) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Phenomenological |
Abstract
We investigate neutrino phenomenology in the $ U(1)_{L_e-L_\tau}$ gauge extension of the Standard Model with symmetry following the framework of type-(I+II) seesaw mechanism. For this, we have added three right handed neutrinos, one singlet and one scalar triplet in our model. We show that the model can successfully accommodate the observed neutrino oscillation data and consistent with the results from lepton flavor violation and neutrinoless double beta decay process.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report
Le-Ltau gauged symmetry is studied in the framework of type (I+II) seesaw mechanism to accommodate the observed neutrino oscillation data as well as predict lepton flavor violation and neutrinoless double beta decay process.
Recommendation
Publish (surpasses expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 10%)
Report #1 by Swagato Banerjee (Referee 1) on 2024-8-9 (Invited Report)
Report
Le-Ltau gauged symmetry is studied in the framework of type (I+II) seesaw mechanism to accommodate the observed neutrino oscillation data as well as predict lepton flavor violation and neutrinoless double beta decay process.
Just after Eqn (1), "< and S>" should be replaced with "and <S>"
mass matices -> mass matrices
Eqn 2 has M_l with small l, but the unnumbered equation between Eqn 3 and Eqn 4 has M_L with capital L. Please make the notation consistent.
Mν is a two-zero A1 texture which favoured normal ordering.
->
Mν has a two-zero A1 texture which favours normal ordering.
we have taken following paramet ranges:
->
we have taken following parameter ranges:
After references [1,2] comes [6], [7]. Please add references [3], [4], and [5].
Also, please make them uniform, ie, either [1,2] ... [6,7] or [1], [2] ... [6] [7].
Br(τ → eγ), Br(τ → μμ ̄μ) -> Br(τ → eγ) and Br(τ → μμ ̄μ)
Recommendation
Publish (surpasses expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 10%)
Author: Papia Panda on 2024-08-10 [id 4686]
(in reply to Report 1 by Swagato Banerjee on 2024-08-09)We thank the referee for their valuable comments.
(i) In the first comment, referee told to change "<and S" to "and <S>", we agree with the referee and changes accordingly in the modifies version.
(ii) "mass matices" has bee replaced by "mass matrices"
(iii) We make a consistency in the notation, we put "M_L" throughout the draft
(iv) Mν is a two-zero A1 texture which favoured normal ordering.
->
Mν has a two-zero A1 texture which favours normal ordering.: this has been modified
(v) we have taken following paramet ranges:
->
we have taken following parameter ranges: this one has also been modified
(vi) We mention [3,4,5] references in the text and make a consistency in the reference style
(vii) we have modified Br(τ → eγ), Br(τ → μμ ̄μ) into Br(τ → eγ) and Br(τ → μμ ̄μ).