SciPost Submission Page
Influence of Geant4 Physics List on Simulation Accuracy and Performance
by Róbert Breier, Alexander Fuss, Holger Kluck, Valentyna Mokina, Veronika Palušová, Pavel Povinec
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Valentyna Mokina · Veronika Palusova |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202209_00048v2 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2022-12-05 13:57 |
| Submitted by: | Palusova, Veronika |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 14th International Conference on Identification of Dark Matter (IDM2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approaches: | Experimental, Computational |
Abstract
A main goal of current low background physics is the search for rare and novel phenomena beyond the Standard Model of particle physics, e.g. the scattering off of a potential Dark Matter particle inside a CaWO4 crystal or the neutrinoless double beta decay of Ge nucleus. The success of such searches depends on a reliable background prediction via Monte Carlo simulations. A widely used toolkit to construct these simulations is GEANT4, which offers a wide choice of physics models, so-called physics lists. To facilitate the selection of physics lists for simulations of CaWO4 and Ge targets, we quantify their impact on the total energy deposition for several test cases.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Strengths
Same as in the previous submission
Weaknesses
Mostly same as in the previous submission but some unclear statements have been clarified in the 2nd version.
Report
Criteria met; recommend to publish
Requested changes
Abbreviation for goodness of fit is used in Conclusions but I do not see this to be introduced earlier.
I suggest to say explicitly in Figure 2 and 3 captions which detector size was used. This is not clear.