SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Status of DMRadio-50L and m$^3$

by Nicholas M. Rapidis

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Nicholas Marcos Rapidis
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202210_00032v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2022-10-03 22:05
Submitted by: Rapidis, Nicholas Marcos
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: 14th International Conference on Identification of Dark Matter (IDM2022)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

Recent theoretical advancements have made the QCD axion a stronger dark matter candidate, especially in the sub-$\mu$eV range. While cavity haloscopes have made significant progress in excluding QCD axions in the $1-100\ \mu\text{eV} $ region, the $1 \text{ peV}- 1\ \mu\text{eV}$ region remains unexplored. The DMRadio program consists of a series of experiments designed to probe low mass axions. DMRadio-50L uses a 1 T average field toroidal magnet and a high-Q LC-oscillator with target sensitivity to axions of $g_{a\gamma\gamma} < 5 \times 10^{-15}\text{ GeV}^{-1}$between 5 kHz and 5 MHz. DMRadio-m$^3$ consists of a higher frequency LC-oscillator in a 4 T peak field solenoidal magnet with sensitivity to the DFSZ model of QCD axions between 30 MHz and 200 MHz. In this work, we present the status of DMRadio-50L and DMRadio-m$^3.$

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-11-6 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202210_00032v1, delivered 2022-11-06, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6059

Report

In this proceeding authors are presenting the status of DMRadio program, particularly of 50L and m^3, looking for QCD axions. DMRadio-50L is about to be finally assembled in summer 2023 and the design of Radio-m^3 is completed. The manuscript is clearly written and well organised. It is also suitably formatted for publication.
I recommend the manuscript for publication after some minor corrections:

Requested changes

- Fig.1 please explain all colours.
- Is there is a plan to set also limit for the N-body model?
- “testbed … for novel …” three times in the test. Maybe one can find an alternative?

  • validity: -
  • significance: high
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment