SciPost Submission Page
Sub-GeV Dark Matter Searches with EDELWEISS: New results and prospects
by Hugues Lattaud on behalf of the EDELWEISS collaboration
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Hugues Lattaud |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | scipost_202210_00038v1 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2022-10-04 11:01 |
Submitted by: | Lattaud, Hugues |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
Proceedings issue: | 14th International Conference on Identification of Dark Matter (IDM2022) |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
The Edelweiss collaboration performs light Dark Matter (DM) particles searches with germanium bolometer collecting charge and phonon signals. Thanks to the Neganov-Trofimov-Luke (NTL) effect, a RMS resolution of 4.46 electron-hole pairs was obtained on a massive (200g) germanium detector instrumented with a NbSi Transition Edge Sensor (TES) operated underground at the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM). This sensitivity made possible a search for WIMP using the Migdal effect down to 32 MeV/C² and exclude cross-sections down to 10e-29 cm². It is the first measurement in cryogenic germanium with such thermal sensor, proving the high relevance of this technology. Furthermore, such TES have shown sensitivity to out-of-equilibrium phonons, paving the way for EDELWEISS new experience CRYOSEL. This is an important step in the development of Ge detectors with improved performance in the context of the EDELWEISS-SubGeV program.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-11-6 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202210_00038v1, delivered 2022-11-06, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6058
Weaknesses
Exceed the allowed length.
Report
In this proceeding author is describing a new result in searches of light Dark Matter down to32MeV/c^2 using Migdal effect. As well the prospects and plans for future improvements and searches. The manuscript is clearly written and well organised. I recommend the manuscript for publication after some minor corrections.
Requested changes
- Fig. 2, you name the limit “nu-cleus 2017” and give reference to CRESST. Please give the correct name. Ref. 23 “CEDEX” - “CDEX” ?
- p.2 can you please indicate the activity of strong AmBe source?
- Fig.4 please add references as for Fig.2
- some typos present
Author: Hugues Lattaud on 2022-11-08 [id 2993]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2022-11-06)Dear reviewer,
-For nu-cleus 2017, the results presented in Fig 2 correspond to the limit achieved with nu-cleus prototype detector, thus there is no mistake in the labelling and the proper paper is cited.
-Unfortunately, I don't have the numbers for the activity of the source.
-I'll add the references
Best regards
Anonymous on 2022-11-08 [id 2994]
(in reply to Hugues Lattaud on 2022-11-08 [id 2993])Dear author,
thank you for the reply. Please submit an updated manuscript.
Best regards.