SciPost Submission Page
Multiplicity dependence of charged-particle jet production in pp collisions at 13 TeV with ALICE
by Debjani Banerjee for the ALICE Collaboration
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Debjani Banerjee |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202210_00060v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2022-10-11 16:42 |
| Submitted by: | Banerjee, Debjani |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 51st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics (ISMD2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
Measurements of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and form a baseline for similar measurements in heavy ion (A--A) collisions. In this contribution, we report recent ALICE measurements of charged-particle jet production and intra-jet properties, including mean charged-constituent multiplicity and fragmentation distribution for leading jets, in minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13\,TeV. In addition, the event multiplicity dependence of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13\,TeV will be presented. Results will be compared with theoretical model predictions.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-12-2 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202210_00060v1, delivered 2022-12-02, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6251
Report
The authors report on the measurement of Multiplicity dependence of charged-particle jet production in pp collisions at 13 TeV with ALICE. The ALICE measurements show their results are helpful for future theoretical model constraints and inputs. The analysis from the published EPJC82, 514(2022) are mature. It is worth to be published in SciPost.
Please find one tiny comment in the conclusion part: Page 3: “significant….” -> “a significant…”