SciPost Submission Page
New perspectives in Gravity-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking
by Robin Ducrocq
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Robin Ducrocq |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202212_00032v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2022-12-16 13:22 |
| Submitted by: | Ducrocq, Robin |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 34th International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics (GROUP2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approaches: | Theoretical, Phenomenological |
Abstract
New solutions in supersymmetry breaking through gravity mediation have been recently discovered. Such solutions have interesting properties regarding renormalisation and introduce new contributions in the scalar potential that may help to resolve some issues of the Standard Model. The purpose of this article is to investigate the consequences of these new structures. We construct a model related to these new solutions, the S2MSSM, and present some preliminary results on the effects of these new contributions, especially on the Standard Model's Higgs boson mass.
Current status:
Has been resubmitted
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Cyril Hugonie (Referee 1) on 2023-1-20 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Cyril Hugonie, Report on arXiv:scipost_202212_00032v1, delivered 2023-01-20, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6575
Report
The Journal's acceptance criteria are met. This paper should be published after two minor revisions.
Author: Robin Ducrocq on 2023-02-14 [id 3354]
(in reply to Report 1 by Cyril Hugonie on 2023-01-20)I would like to warmly thank the reviewer of this paper for the quality of the comments/advice/corrections. The two comments have been considered to produce a revised version of the article. Please find below the answers to each comment. We hope that these answers will satisfy the expectations of the referee:
1) On page 4, in the definition of the model, the author writes ”we restrict ourselves to a Z3 invariant W0 superpotential (only cubic terms)”. This statement should be justified (e.g. by imposing some symmetry).
2) On page 5, the author writes ”Since there are no interactions between the hybrid and the observable sector in the W0”. I reckon this should read ”in the superpotential W0” or simply ”in W0”.