SciPost Submission Page
Centrality dependence of multistrange baryon production in high-energy heavy-ion collisions
by G. H. Arakelyan, C. Merino, Yu. M. Shabelski
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Carlos Merino |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202302_00003v1 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | 2023-07-04 |
| Date submitted: | 2023-02-02 11:56 |
| Submitted by: | Merino, Carlos |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 51st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics (ISMD2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Phenomenological |
Abstract
We consider the experimental data on the production of strange Lambdas, and multistrange baryons (Xi, Omega), and antibaryons, on nuclear targets, at the energy region from SPS up to LHC, in the framework of the Quark-Gluon String Model. One remarkable result of this analysis is the significant dependence on the centrality of the collision of the experimental ratios bar(Xi)+/bar(Lambda) and bar(Omega)+/bar(Lambda) ratios in heavy-ion collisions, at SPS energies.
List of changes
Dear Colleagues,
We have revisited our contribution "Centrality dependence of
multistrange baryon production in high-energy heavy-ion collisions",
to the Proceedings of the 51st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics (ISMD2022), held in Pitlochry,
Scottish Highlands, on 1-5 August 2022, to comply with the minor comments raised by the referee.
We have also replace the manuscript in arXiv, where the revisited manuscript has already appeared on January 19th (arXiv:2209.14680v2 [hep-ph]).
This is the list of changes we have done in our manuscript to comply with
the minor comments raised by the referee:
1. We have added description of what solid and dashed lines are in the
figure captions of figures 1 and 2.
2. We have added some sentences in the last paragraph of section 1, and
in the second paragraph of section 2, to explain how the values of parameter
lambda_s entering solid lines are determined.
3. We have included in the section Conclusion some discussion on where to
look for the possible theoretical interpretation of our findings.
4. At the end of the before-the-last paragraph of section 2, to have rewritten
the sentence starting with "We see here (...), and the all the sentences until
the end of the paragraph to make the meaning of our statement.
5. We have corrected all the typos signaled by the referee in her/his report.
Thank you for your help,
Carlos Merino
(on behalf of the authors)
Carlos Merino Gayoso
Dpto. Física de Partículas - Facultad de Física
Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE)
Campus Universitario s/n
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
15782 Santiago de Compostela
Spain
Published as SciPost Phys. Proc. 15, 024 (2024)