SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Lack of near-sightedness principle in non-Hermitian systems

by Helene Spring, Viktor Könye, Anton R. Akhmerov, Ion Cosma Fulga

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Anton Akhmerov · Ion Cosma Fulga · Viktor Könye · Helene Spring
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202310_00002v2  (pdf)
Code repository: https://zenodo.org/records/8204845
Data repository: https://zenodo.org/records/8204845
Date submitted: 2024-08-15 12:41
Submitted by: Spring, Helene
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Computational
Approaches: Theoretical, Computational

Abstract

The non-Hermitian skin effect is a phenomenon in which an extensive number of states accumulates at the boundaries of a system. It has been associated to nontrivial topology, with nonzero bulk invariants predicting its appearance and its position in real space. Here we demonstrate that the non-Hermitian skin effect has weaker bulk-edge correspondence than topological insulators: when translation symmetry is broken by a single non-Hermitian impurity, skin modes are depleted at the boundary and accumulate at the impurity site, without changing any bulk invariant. Similarly, a single non-Hermitian impurity may deplete the states from a region of Hermitian bulk.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

Dear editor,

We have now responded to the referees and attached a redlined version of the manuscript with marked changes compared to the previous submission to our responses.

We believe that we have addressed the main concerns expressed in report 5 by clarifying the manuscript and addressing some of the misunderstanding.

Best regards,
The authors

List of changes

Listed in full in the replies to referees of the first submission.

Current status:
In refereeing

Login to report or comment