SciPost Submission Page
Analytical expression for $\pi$-ton vertex contributions to the optical conductivity
by Juraj Krsnik, Anna Kauch, Karsten Held
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Anna Kauch · Juraj Krsnik |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | scipost_202409_00019v2 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2025-02-13 14:42 |
Submitted by: | Krsnik, Juraj |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
Vertex corrections from the transversal particle-hole channel, so-called $\pi$-tons, are generic in models for strongly correlated electron systems and can lead to a displaced Drude peak (DDP). Here, we derive the analytical expression for these $\pi$-tons, and how they affect the optical conductivity as a function of correlation length $\xi$, fermion lifetime $\tau$, temperature $T$, and coupling strength to spin or charge fluctuations $g$. In particular, for $T\rightarrow T_c$, the critical temperature for antiferromagnetic or charge ordering, the dc vertex correction is algebraic $\sigma_{VERT}^{dc}\propto \xi \sim (T-T_c)^{-\nu}$ in one dimension and logarithmic $\sigma_{VERT}^{dc}\propto \ln\xi \sim \nu \ln (T-T_c)$ in two dimensions. Here, $\nu$ is the critical exponent for the correlation length. If we have the exponential scaling $\xi \sim e^{1/T}$ of an ideal two-dimensional system, the DDP becomes more pronounced with increasing $T$ but fades away at low temperatures where only a broadening of the Drude peak remains, as it is observed experimentally, with the dc resistivity exhibiting a linear $T$ dependence at low temperatures. Further, we find the maximum of the DPP to be given by the inverse lifetime: $\omega_{DDP} \sim 1/\tau$. These characteristic dependencies can guide experiments to evidence $\pi$-tons in actual materials.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Author comments upon resubmission
In response to their comments and suggestions, we have revised the manuscript as detailed below.
We believe these updates have improved the importance and quality of the manuscript.
List of changes
We have made the following revisions to the manuscript:
- Added a new Subsection 3.2.3 discussing the temperature dependence of the DC resistivity in the ideal 2D case. Corresponding comments have also been included in the Abstract and Conclusion.
- Introduced Fig. 1, which diagrammatically represents the current-current correlation function with the $\pi$-ton vertex corrections considered in the manuscript.
- Moved the introduction of the Green’s function $G^{e/h}$ to the section where the bubble contribution is evaluated and provided a more detailed explanation of the evaluation process.
- Included a footnote on single-boson vertex corrections within the slave boson theory, along with relevant references. Valuable discussions with M. Grilli are acknowledged.
- Added comments on $\pi$-ton vertex corrections in 3D and explained why we assume them to be small.
- Briefly discussed the potential behavior of $\pi$-tons far from the transition, referring to previous works.
- Explained why considered $\pi$-ton vertex corrections may lead to unphysical negative conductivity.
- Emphasized that the optical sum spectral weight is entirely determined by the bubble contribution due to the considered momentum-independent self-energy.
- Clarified the meaning of the adaptive integration results.
- Provided arguments explaining why our approach does not allow for a Drude peak alongside a finite-frequency maximum, but rather results in either a Drude peak with no additional finite-frequency maximum or a displaced Drude peak.
- Made additional minor revisions in response to the Referees' reports.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Simone Fratini (Referee 1) on 2025-3-21 (Invited Report)
Report
I am satisfied with the changes, the paper can be published in the present form.
Recommendation
Publish (surpasses expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 10%)