Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

QGSJET-III: predictions for extensive air shower characteristics and the corresponding uncertainties

by Sergey Ostapchenko

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Sergey Ostapchenko
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202411_00007v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2025-01-13
Date submitted: 2024-11-04 21:58
Submitted by: Ostapchenko, Sergey
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: 22nd International Symposium on Very High Energy Cosmic Ray Interactions (ISVHECRI 2024)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Gravitation, Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approach: Phenomenological

Abstract

The physics content of the QGSJET-III Monte Carlo model of high energy hadronic interactions is briefly described. The predictions of the model for extensive air shower characteristics are presented in comparison to the corresponding results of other Monte Carlo generators of cosmic ray interactions. The results of a recent quantitative analysis of uncertainties for such predictions are discussed, notably, regarding possibilities to enhance the muon content of extensive air showers or to delay the air shower development.

Current status:
Accepted in target Journal

Editorial decision: For Journal SciPost Physics Proceedings: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2024-12-14 (Invited Report)

Strengths

1 - treat the uncertainties of the most important variables of EAS development
2- ideas based on string theoretical considerations
3- results important for the ultra-high energy cosmic ray analysis

Weaknesses

1- limit the analysis to one given model framework

Report

The content of the paper covers very well the presentation at the conference

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: good
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: good

Login to report or comment