Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

The fermionic double smeared null energy condition

by Duarte dos Reis Fragoso, Lihan Guo

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Lihan Guo · Duarte dos Reis Fragoso
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202411_00017v3  (pdf)
Date accepted: June 11, 2025
Date submitted: June 4, 2025, 9:59 p.m.
Submitted by: dos Reis Fragoso, Duarte
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
  • Quantum Physics
Approaches: Theoretical, Computational

Abstract

Energy conditions are crucial for understanding why exotic phenomena such as traversable wormholes and closed timelike curves remain elusive. In this paper, we prove the Double Smeared Null Energy Condition (DSNEC) for the fermionic free theory in 4-dimensional flat Minkowski space-time, extending previous work on the same energy condition for the bosonic case [1] [2] by adapting Fewster and Mistry’s method [3] to the energy- momentum tensor T_{++}. A notable difference from previous works lies in the presence of the γ_0γ_+ matrix in T_{++}, causing a loss of symmetry. This challenge is addressed by mak- ing use of its square-root matrix. We provide explicit analytic results for the massless case as well as numerical insights for the mass-dependence of the bound in the case of Gaussian smearing.

Author comments upon resubmission

Dear reviewer.

Thank you for the detailed comments regarding the convergence of our bounds and other useful feedback.
On my and my co-author's behalf, I am resubmitting the paper, after correcting the typos and inaccuracies pointed out in the review.

Thank you again for the help,

Best regards,

Duarte Fragoso

List of changes

We fixed the missing factor of 1/2 in the expression of \gamma_+ (and the consequences of this overall factor throughout the paper)

On page 7, line 127 we changed "lemma 1" to the correct equation (equation 29)

We changed the argument regarding convergence of the bound given in equation 46 by analyzing the positive and negative powers of v separately, as suggested by the reviewer, bounding the original integrals by others that are evidently finite.

Published as SciPost Phys. Core 8, 045 (2025)

Login to report or comment