Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Four no-go theorems on the existence of spin and orbital angular momentum of massless bosons

by Eric Palmerduca, Hong Qin

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Eric Palmerduca
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202412_00011v3  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2025-04-16 19:26
Submitted by: Palmerduca, Eric
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
  • Mathematical Physics
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

The past decades have seen substantial interest in the so-called orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light, driven largely by its diverse range of applications. However, there are fundamental theoretical issues with decomposing the angular momentum of massless particles, such as photons, into spin (SAM) and orbital angular momentum parts. While the angular momentum of massive particles has a natural splitting into the Wigner SAM and OAM, there are numerous proposed splittings for photons and no consensus about which is correct. Moreover, it has been shown that most of the proposed SAM and OAM operators do not satisfy the defining commutation relations of angular momentum operators and are thus not legitimate splittings. Here, we prove that it is generally impossible to split the total angular momentum operator of massless bosons, such as photons and gravitons, into spin and orbital parts. We prove two further generalizations of this result, showing that there are no SAM-OAM splittings even if (1) the SAM operator generates non-internal symmetries or (2) if one allows the SAM and OAM operators to generate non-SO(3) symmetries.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

We thank the Editor and Referee for their time in reviewing our article. The Referee points out that our manuscript would be strengthened by further analysis of the helicity operator which generates the massless little group. We agree and have provided a detailed response to the Referee and added corresponding material to the manuscript at the end of Section 5. We hope the Referee finds our response and revision satisfactorily addresses their comment.
Current status:
In voting

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2025-4-27 (Invited Report)

Report

No further comments.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment