Processing math: 100%
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Systematically Constructing the Likelihood for Boosted Hgg Decays

by Andrew J. Larkoski

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Andrew Larkoski
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202503_00004v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2025-03-24 16:33
Submitted by: Larkoski, Andrew
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Theoretical, Phenomenological

Abstract

We study the binary discrimination problem of identification of boosted Hgg decays from massive QCD jets in a systematic expansion in the strong coupling. Though this decay mode of the Higgs is unlikely to be discovered at the LHC, we analytically demonstrate several features of the likelihood ratio for this problem through explicit analysis of signal and background matrix elements. Through leading-order, we prove that by imposing a constraint on the jet mass and measuring the energy fraction of the softer subjet an improvement of signal to background ratio that is independent of the kinematics of the jets at high boosts can be obtained, and is approximately equal to the inverse of the strong coupling evaluated at the Higgs mass. At next-to-leading order, we construct a powerful discrimination observable through a sort of anomaly detection approach by simply inverting the next-to-leading order Hgg matrix element with soft gluon emission, which is naturally infrared and collinear safe. Our analytic conclusions are validated in simulated data from all-purpose event generators and subsequent parton showering and demonstrate that the signal-to-background ratio can be improved by a factor of several hundred at high, but accessible, jet energies at the LHC.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

Updated manuscript to reflect referee comments

List of changes

See responses to referee reports

Current status:
Voting in preparation

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-3-27 (Invited Report)

Report

I thank the author for answering my additional question and addressing my comment. Congratulations to this interesting and important study!

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment