SciPost Submission Page
Generalized lattices, conformal manifolds, and symmetries
by Shlomo S. Razamat, Michal Shemesh, and Aelly Zeltzer
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Shlomo S. Razamat |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202504_00018v2 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | July 30, 2025 |
| Date submitted: | July 22, 2025, 8:38 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Shlomo S. Razamat |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We consider supersymmetric conformal quantum field theories (SCFTs) with degrees of freedom labeled by lattice data. We will assume that in terms of the corresponding lattice the interactions are nearest neighbor and exactly marginal. For example, one can construct such theories by coupling many copies of a single SCFT with exactly marginal deformations. In particular, we discuss the interplay between conformal manifolds of such theories and their global, on-site and lattice, symmetries. We show that one can interpret certain current non-conservation equations for symmetries broken by the interactions as conservation equations including the lattice directions. Moreover, we discuss a class of exactly marginal deformations which are labeled by lattice holonomies that are topological on the lattice. We discuss concrete examples of such constructions and comment on their relevance to compactifications of SCFTs.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
1) Footnote 27 was added to stress that the dualities we consider are conformal dualities.
2) Footnote 28 was added to mention a possible connection to brane constructions.
3) The spelling and grammar typos caught by the referees were corrected.
Published as SciPost Phys. 19, 069 (2025)
