SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I

by Lakshya Bhardwaj, Daniel Pajer, Sakura Schäfer-Nameki, Apoorv Tiwari, Alison Warman, Jingxiang Wu

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Daniel Pajer · Sakura Schäfer-Nameki · Alison Warman · Jingxiang Wu
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202506_00048v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: July 28, 2025
Date submitted: June 25, 2025, 8:46 a.m.
Submitted by: Jingxiang Wu
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
  • Mathematical Physics
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

We use the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) to study and classify gapped phases in (2+1)d for a class of categorical symmetries, referred to as being of bosonic type. The SymTFTs for these symmetries are given by twisted and untwisted (3+1)d Dijkgraaf-Witten (DW) theories for finite groups G. A finite set of boundary conditions (BCs) of these DW theories is well-known: these simply involve imposing Dirichlet and Neumann conditions on the (3+1)d gauge fields. We refer to these as minimal BCs. The key new observation here is that for each DW theory, there exists an infinite number of other BCs, that we call non-minimal BCs. These non-minimal BCs are all obtained by a 'theta construction', which involves stacking the Dirichlet BC with 3d TFTs having G 0-form symmetry, and gauging the diagonal G symmetry. On the one hand, using the non-minimal BCs as symmetry BCs gives rise to an infinite number of non-invertible symmetries having the same SymTFT, while on the other hand, using the non-minimal BCs as physical BCs in the sandwich construction gives rise to an infinite number of (2+1)d gapped phases for each such non-invertible symmetry. Our analysis is thoroughly exemplified for G = $\mathbb{Z_2}$ and more generally any finite abelian group, for which the resulting non-invertible symmetries and their gapped phases already reveal an immensely rich structure.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Published as SciPost Phys. 19, 056 (2025)


Reports on this Submission

Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2025-7-17 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have addressed all my previous comments.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-7-14 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202506_00048v1, delivered 2025-07-14, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.11568

Report

Thanks for the clarifications the author made in the reply. I must correct myself in my previous report that the examples with a non-minimal boundary condition as the symmetry boundary is indeed literally a phase with non-invertible symmetry. My complaint was that these examples were boring which are just an abelian group coupled to MTCs. However, I have seen the progress the authors made in Part II, where genuine non-invertible symmetries are discussed (e.g. the 2 representations of a 2-group). This partially solved my previous concern about the significance of the paper. However, I'm still conservative about this work. As mentioned in other reports, there are quite a few mathematical inaccuracies/mistakes and such phenomenon continues to Part II; this potentially harms the technical validity of this work. Since the significance of Part I mainly lies in the nontrivial examples in Part II, and Part II also depends a lot on Part I for many backgrounds and technical preparations, I would suggest a publication of Part I on Scipost Physics, conditionally if Part II is also accepted.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-7-13 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202506_00048v1, delivered 2025-07-13, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.11558

Strengths

1-The analysis of gapped phases in (2+1)d is both new and interesting.
2-The treatment is very explicit.
3-Many concrete examples are provided.

Weaknesses

1-The authors only consider the case of abelian groups with trivial twist.
2-The content of section 3 is by now quite standard, both in the Math and Physics literatures.
3-The preprint is still quite long.

Report

This preprint meets SciPost's publication criteria. See below for a few minor comments.

Requested changes

Most of my comments have been satisfactorily addressed. That being saud, my opinion remains that this preprint is on the lengthier side. I also wish to clarify one of my comments:

  1. I believe that the categories on page 53 have also been extensively analyzed by Delcamp-Tiwari (arXiv:2301.01259) and Decoppet-Yu (arXiv:2306.08117).

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: perfect
  • grammar: perfect

Login to report or comment