SciPost Submission Page
An integrable deformed Landau-Lifshitz model with particle production?
by Marius de Leeuw, Andrea Fontanella, Juan Miguel Nieto García
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Juan Miguel Nieto García |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202507_00048v2 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | Dec. 18, 2025, 8:17 p.m. |
| Submitted by: | Juan Miguel Nieto García |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We discuss the continuum limit of a non-Hermitian deformation of the Heisenberg XXX spin chain. This model appeared in the classification of $4\times4$ solutions of the Yang--Baxter equation and it has the particular feature that the transfer matrix is non-diagonalisable. We show that the model is given by a Drinfeld twist of the XXX spin chain and its continuum limit is a non-unitary deformation of the Landau–Lifshitz model. We compute the tower of conserved charges for this deformed Landau–Lifshitz model and show that they are generated by a boost operator. We furthermore show that it gives a non-vanishing $1\to 2$ S-matrix, where one of the outgoing particles has vanishing energy and momentum, and thus it does not fulfil the usual "no particle production" condition of integrability. We argue that this result is natural when looked from the point of view of the non-diagonalisability of the spin chain.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
- We have fixed the typos pointed by referee 3.
- We implemented the minor points raised by referee 2.
- We added footnote 6 above eq. (2.36) regarding the matching of classical and quantum charges.
- We added footnote 12 regarding the aim of computing the S-matrix.
- We have rewritten parts of section 2.3 to make it more clear.
- We amended the "S-matrix factorization" point in the conclusions.
- We have replaced $L$ by $\ell$ for the continuum model.
