SciPost Physics

SciPost Phys. 10, 047 (2021) · published 23 February 2021

• doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.047
• pdf
• BiBTeX
• RIS
• Submissions/Reports
• 

Abstract

The NANOGrav collaboration has recently observed first evidence of a grav- itational wave background (GWB) in pulsar timing data. Here we explore the possibility that this GWB is due to new physics, and show that the signal can be well fit also with peaked spectra like the ones expected from phase transitions (PTs) or from the dynamics of axion like particles (ALPs) in the early universe. We find that a good fit to the data is obtained for a very strong PT at temperatures around 1 MeV to 10 MeV. For the ALP explanation the best fit is obtained for a decay constant of F ≈ 5 × 10^17 GeV and an axion mass of 2 × 10^−13 eV. We also illustrate the ability of PTAs to constrain the parameter space of these models, and obtain limits which are already comparable to other cosmological bounds.

• Xue et al., Constraining Cosmological Phase Transitions with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251303 (2021) [Crossref]
• Oikonomou, Implications of a scalar field interacting with the dark matter fluid on primordial gravitational waves
  Phys. Rev. D 110, 023535 (2024) [Crossref]
• Lamb et al., Rapid refitting techniques for Bayesian spectral characterization of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 103019 (2023) [Crossref]
• Brandenburg et al., The scalar, vector, and tensor modes in gravitational wave turbulence simulations
  Class. Quantum Grav. 38, 145002 (2021) [Crossref]
• Lee et al., Probing small-scale power spectra with pulsar timing arrays
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 28 (2021) [Crossref]
• Mansoori et al., PBHs and GWs from 𝕋2-inflation and NANOGrav 15-year data
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 067 (2023) [Crossref]
• Kitajima et al., Stochastic gravitational wave background from early dark energy
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 074 (2023) [Crossref]
• Yokoyama, Implication of pulsar timing array experiments on cosmological gravitational wave detection
  AAPPS Bull. 31, 17 (2021) [Crossref]
• Domenech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review
  Universe 7, 398 (2021) [Crossref]
• Li et al., Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021, 024 (2021) [Crossref]
• Lewicki et al., Electroweak bubble wall expansion: gravitational waves and baryogenesis in Standard Model-like thermal plasma
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 17 (2022) [Crossref]
• Sun et al., Pulsar timing residual induced by wideband ultralight dark matter with spin 0,1,2
  Phys. Rev. D 106, 066006 (2022) [Crossref]
• Papageorgiou et al., Axion dark matter from frictional misalignment
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 169 (2023) [Crossref]
• Ghosh et al., Did we hear the sound of the Universe boiling? Analysis using the full fluid velocity profiles and NANOGrav 15-year data
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2024, 100 (2024) [Crossref]
• Gouttenoire, First-Order Phase Transition Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consistent with Solar-Mass Black Holes
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 171404 (2023) [Crossref]
• Barish et al., Impact of a midband gravitational wave experiment on detectability of cosmological stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds
  Phys. Rev. D 103, 123541 (2021) [Crossref]
• Batell et al., Gravitational Waves from Nnaturalness
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 148 (2024) [Crossref]
• Afzal et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics
  ApJL 951, L11 (2023) [Crossref]
• Chen et al., Search for the Gravitational-wave Background from Cosmic Strings with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Second Data Release
  ApJ 936, 20 (2022) [Crossref]
• Li et al., Collider test of nano-Hertz gravitational waves from pulsar timing arrays
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 055018 (2023) [Crossref]
• Chiang et al., Testing clockwork axion with gravitational waves
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021, 049 (2021) [Crossref]
• Domènech et al., NANOGrav hints on planet-mass primordial black holes
  Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 230411 (2022) [Crossref]
• Madge et al., Audible axions with a booster: Stochastic gravitational waves from rotating ALPs
  SciPost Phys. 12, 171 (2022) [Crossref]
• Kitajima et al., Gravitational waves from domain wall collapse, and application to nanohertz signals with QCD-coupled axions
  Physics Letters B 851, 138586 138586 (2024) [Crossref]
• Arzoumanian et al., Searching for Gravitational Waves from Cosmological Phase Transitions with the NANOGrav 12.5-Year Dataset
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251302 (2021) [Crossref]
• Zhang et al., Detecting new fundamental fields with pulsar timing arrays
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 104069 (2023) [Crossref]
• Ferrer et al., Imprints of a supercooled phase transition in the gravitational wave spectrum from a cosmic string network
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 36 (2023) [Crossref]
• Lewicki et al., Gravitational waves from bubble collisions and fluid motion in strongly supercooled phase transitions
  Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 109 (2023) [Crossref]
• Cheng et al., Detecting the stochastic gravitational wave background with the TianQin detector
  Phys. Rev. D 106, 124027 (2022) [Crossref]
• Fujikura et al., NANOGrav signal from a dark conformal phase transition
  Physics Letters B 846, 138203 138203 (2023) [Crossref]
• Dent et al., Sensitivity to dark sector scales from gravitational wave signatures
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 300 (2022) [Crossref]
• Borah et al., A first order dark SU(2) D phase transition with vector dark matter in the light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021, 039 (2021) [Crossref]
• Ramberg et al., One μ to rule them all: CMB spectral distortions can probe domain walls, cosmic strings and low scale phase transitions
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 039 (2023) [Crossref]
• Athron et al., Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 221001 (2024) [Crossref]
• Li et al., NANOGrav signal from first-order confinement-deconfinement phase transition in different QCD-matter scenarios
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 043510 (2021) [Crossref]
• Chigusa et al., Implications of gravitational waves for supersymmetric grand unification
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 035031 (2021) [Crossref]
• Moore et al., Ultra-low-frequency gravitational waves from cosmological and astrophysical processes
  Nat Astron 5, 1268 (2021) [Crossref]
• Borah et al., Gravitational waves from a dark U(1)D phase transition in light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 063501 (2021) [Crossref]
• Liu, Distinguishing the nanohertz gravitational-wave sources by the observations of compact dark matter subhalos
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 123544 (2023) [Crossref]
• Banerjee et al., Gravitational wave echo of relaxion trapping
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 055026 (2021) [Crossref]
• Bian et al., The Gravitational-wave physics II: Progress
  Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64, 120401 (2021) [Crossref]
• Freese et al., Have pulsar timing arrays detected the hot big bang: Gravitational waves from strong first order phase transitions in the early Universe
  Phys. Rev. D 106, 103523 (2022) [Crossref]
• Ge, Stochastic gravitational wave background: birth from string-wall death
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2024, 064 (2024) [Crossref]
• Lewicki et al., Bubble dynamics in fluids with N -body simulations
  Phys. Rev. D 106, 103501 (2022) [Crossref]
• Barir et al., Gravitational waves from incomplete inflationary phase transitions
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 115016 (2023) [Crossref]
• Lewicki et al., Escape from supercooling with or without bubbles: gravitational wave signatures
  Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 857 (2021) [Crossref]
• Maiorano et al., Principles of Gravitational-Wave Detection with Pulsar Timing Arrays
  Symmetry 13, 2418 (2021) [Crossref]
• Han et al., Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves
  Phys. Rev. D 109, 115025 (2024) [Crossref]
• Samanta et al., Gravitational wave complementarity and impact of NANOGrav data on gravitational leptogenesis
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 211 (2021) [Crossref]
• Megías et al., Pulsar timing array stochastic background from light Kaluza-Klein resonances
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 095017 (2023) [Crossref]
• Yi et al., NANOGrav signal and LIGO-Virgo primordial black holes from the Higgs field
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022, 046 (2022) [Crossref]
• Blas et al., Bridging the μHz Gap in the Gravitational-Wave Landscape with Binary Resonances
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 101103 (2022) [Crossref]
• Roper Pol et al., Gravitational wave signal from primordial magnetic fields in the Pulsar Timing Array frequency band
  Phys. Rev. D 105, 123502 (2022) [Crossref]
• Bai et al., Cosmological constraints on first-order phase transitions
  Phys. Rev. D 105, 095015 (2022) [Crossref]
• Oikonomou, Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 043516 (2023) [Crossref]
• Odintsov et al., The necessity of multi-band observations of the stochastic gravitational wave background
  Physics of the Dark Universe 46, 101562 101562 (2024) [Crossref]
• Chen et al., Asymmetric dark matter with a spontaneously broken U(1)′ : Self-interaction and gravitational waves
  Phys. Rev. D 107, 095027 (2023) [Crossref]
• Madge et al., Primordial gravitational waves in the nano-Hertz regime and PTA data — towards solving the GW inverse problem
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 171 (2023) [Crossref]
• Ahmadvand et al., Heavy QCD axion model in light of pulsar timing arrays
  Phys. Rev. D 108, 115020 (2023) [Crossref]
• Gouttenoire et al., Domain wall interpretation of the PTA signal confronting black hole overproduction
  Phys. Rev. D 110, L061306 (2024) [Crossref]
• Kitajima et al., Nonthermally trapped inflation by tachyonic dark photon production
  Phys. Rev. D 105, 103011 (2022) [Crossref]
• Bringmann et al., Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition?
  J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 053 (2023) [Crossref]
• Benetti et al., Primordial gravitational waves from NANOGrav: A broken power-law approach
  Phys. Rev. D 105, 043520 (2022) [Crossref]
• Sharma, Constraining models of inflationary magnetogenesis with NANOGrav data
  Phys. Rev. D 105, L041302 (2022) [Crossref]
• Tasinato, Gravitational wave nonlinearities and pulsar-timing array angular correlations
  Phys. Rev. D 105, 083506 (2022) [Crossref]
• Vagnozzi, Inflationary interpretation of the stochastic gravitational wave background signal detected by pulsar timing array experiments
  Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 39, 81 (2023) [Crossref]
• Ünal et al., Axion-gauge dynamics during inflation as the origin of pulsar timing array signals and primordial black holes
  Physics Letters B 856, 138873 138873 (2024) [Crossref]
• Eichhorn et al., From quantum gravity to gravitational waves through cosmic strings
  Phys. Rev. D 109, 026013 (2024) [Crossref]
• Freese et al., Dark matter and gravitational waves from a dark big bang
  Phys. Rev. D 107, 083522 (2023) [Crossref]
• Gould et al., On the perturbative expansion at high temperature and implications for cosmological phase transitions
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 69 (2021) [Crossref]
• Oikonomou et al., Primordial Cosmology of an Emergent-like Universe from Modified Gravity: Reconstruction and Phenomenology Optimization with a Genetic Algorithm
  Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, S0218271823501146 (2023) [Crossref]
• Bian et al., Gravitational wave sources for pulsar timing arrays
  Phys. Rev. D 109, L101301 (2024) [Crossref]
• Ratzinger et al., Gravitational waves from an axion-dark photon system: A lattice study
  SciPost Phys. 11, 001 (2021) [Crossref]