SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Effective field theory of a vortex lattice in a bosonic superfluid

by Sergej Moroz, Carlos Hoyos, Claudio Benzoni, Dam Thanh Son

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Sergej Moroz
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10934v3  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2018-10-03
Date submitted: 2018-09-18 02:00
Submitted by: Moroz, Sergej
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Using boson-vortex duality, we formulate a low-energy effective theory of a two-dimensional vortex lattice in a bosonic Galilean-invariant compressible superfluid. The excitation spectrum contains a gapped Kohn mode and an elliptically polarized Tkachenko mode that has quadratic dispersion relation at low momenta. External rotation breaks parity and time-reversal symmetries and gives rise to Hall responses. We extract the particle number current and stress tensor linear responses and investigate the relations between them that follow from Galilean symmetry. We argue that elementary particles and vortices do not couple to the spin connection which suggests that the Hall viscosity at zero frequency and momentum vanishes in a vortex lattice.

Author comments upon resubmission

Dear Editor,

Thank you for considering our paper for publication in SciPost.

We are grateful to both Referees for carefully reading our paper and providing valuable feedback. In two replies we provided point-by-point answers to the comments of the Referees and the list of changes implemented in the present resubmission.

with best regards,

Sergej Moroz, Carlos Hoyos, Claudio Benzoni and Dam Thanh Son

Published as SciPost Phys. 5, 039 (2018)


Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 4) on 2018-9-25 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have addressed carefully all the points raised in
my previous report and modified the manuscript accordingly. I support the publication in the current form.

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: high
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2018-9-24 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have responded to all of the points raised in my first report. In view of the strengths listed there, and the subsequent revisions, I am happy to recommend the paper for publication in its current form.

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: high
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment