SciPost Submission Page
Phase transitions in the early universe
by Mark B. Hindmarsh, Marvin Lüben, Johannes Lumma, Martin Pauly
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Marvin Lüben · Martin Pauly |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09136v2 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2020-09-25 18:18 |
| Submitted by: | Pauly, Martin |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Lecture Notes |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approaches: | Theoretical, Computational, Phenomenological |
Abstract
These lecture notes are based on a course given by Mark Hindmarsh at the 24th Saalburg Summer School 2018 and written up by Marvin Lüben, Johannes Lumma and Martin Pauly. The aim is to provide the necessary basics to understand first-order phase transitions in the early universe, to outline how they leave imprints in gravitational waves, and advertise how those gravitational waves could be detected in the future. A first-order phase transition at the electroweak scale is a prediction of many theories beyond the Standard Model, and is also motivated as an ingredient of some theories attempting to provide an explanation for the matter-antimatter asymmetry in our Universe. Starting from bosonic and fermionic statistics, we derive Boltzmann's equation and generalise to a fluid of particles with field dependent mass. We introduce the thermal effective potential for the field in its lowest order approximation, discuss the transition to the Higgs phase in the Standard Model and beyond, and compute the probability for the field to cross a potential barrier. After these preliminaries, we provide a hydrodynamical description of first-order phase transitions as it is appropriate for describing the early Universe. We thereby discuss the key quantities characterising a phase transition, and how they are imprinted in the gravitational wave power spectrum that might be detectable by the space-based gravitational wave detector LISA in the 2030s.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2020-11-3 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2008.09136v2, delivered 2020-11-03, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2149
Strengths
The review is well written; relevant topics are discussed in some details. I believe it will be a good addition to several reviews written in this popular research direction which will keep the scientific community busy for a long time.
- I have taken a stance that this is a scientific discussion, and I will be happy to present myself as your referee. I am Anupam Mazumdar, one of the authors of your Ref.[17].
Weaknesses
I do not see any obvious weakness in the review.
The subject is topical, and despite several reviews written in this field of research, this review is a welcoming addition.
Report
I have a few requests to the authors. They may wish to add the discussion at their discretion. These suggestions will only help the review further, in my opinion.
a) A broader view on phase transition would be constructive in the introduction. As the authors know very well that one can have both thermal/non-thermal phase transitions in the early Universe, and either of them can trigger gravitational waves; via preheating, or during fragmentation of the inflation condensate, see your Ref.[17] and references therein. This will make the discussion more rounded. Otherwise, the reader may be forced to take the message that there is only one type of phase transition, i.e., thermal.
b) Slightly technical issue, but I trust the authors can do a perfect job here; it is related to the fact that the loop corrections to the effective potential at either zero temperature or in a finite temperature are not real everywhere in the field space. This has been discussed by several notable authors,
see https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07613, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0370269388908623?via%3Dihub,
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2474
It would be very nice to discuss this topic here as well. Furthermore, it will help the readers a lot.
c) Fig. [20] is very instructive, but Fig. [21] does not add much physics. It gives the impression that the ball is sliding away on a dusty pitch! it may be worth pausing and explaining the physics bit better. A simulation can only be taken with a grain of salt, so worth giving the assumptions behind these simulations.
d) Fig.[20] is very nice, but what are the other competitors in the market; for instance, astrophysics sources, have we exhausted all the spectra of the astrophysical sources from redshift, z=8-9 - to- all the way to 3-4 where LISA would be sensitive to? I am not an expert in this field myself, but introducing a paragraph won't hurt the readers.
Of course, these are minor modifications, and it is not necessary as such, except it will improve your article a notch better that already extremely well-presented review in my opinion.
Anonymous Report 1 on 2020-11-2 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2008.09136v2, delivered 2020-11-02, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2136
Strengths
Excellent review of the subject, complete and pedagogical.
Weaknesses
The spectral shape of the GW signal is still work in progress, but this is not a weakness of the lecture notes, it simply reflects the state of the art in the field.
Report
I strongly recommend publication of these lecture notes, which collect in a unique piece of work a relevant amount of scattered information, rendering them very useful both for the community and for students wishing to learn about phase transitions in the early universe.
Author: Martin Pauly on 2021-01-06 [id 1126]
(in reply to Report 2 on 2020-11-03)We thank the referee for their time and comments on the manuscript.
In the following we briefly address the helpful comments in the report:
a) We have added a paragraph on non-thermal phenomena in the introduction that also points interested readers to further references.
b) We have decided to not discuss this topic in detail, as it would render our discussion of the thermal potential a lot more technical. Instead, we have added a paragraph with relevant references that go into more depth on this topic on page 10.
c) We have added a few sentences that go into more detail on the physics of Fig. 21 - we hope that this makes the physics behind that figure clearer.
d) We have added a comment on this in Sec. 8.1 that points out that there are also various astrophysical sources. For more details we have added relevant references.
We thank the referee for pointing out these possibilities for improvement.