SciPost Submission Page
Invariant RenormalizationGroup improvement
by Aaron Held
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Aaron Held 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11458v1 (pdf) 
Code repository:  https://github.com/aaronhd/invRGancillary 
Date submitted:  20210602 18:29 
Submitted by:  Held, Aaron 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approach:  Theoretical 
Abstract
RenormalizationGroup (RG) improvement has been frequently applied to capture the effect of quantum corrections on cosmological and blackhole spacetimes. This work utilizes an algebraically complete set of curvature invariants to establish that: On the one hand, RG improvement at the level of the metric is coordinatedependent. On the other hand, a newly proposed RG improvement at the level of curvature invariants is coordinateindependent. Sphericallysymmetric and axiallysymmetric blackhole spacetimes serve as physically relevant examples.
Current status:
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
Report
Dear Editor,
the author describes an interesting generalization to the RGimprovement procedure in gravity. It greatly improves the potential of the method because it address the issue of coordinate dependence in the procedure of RGimprovement. It thus greatly enlarges the potential application of the method (besides simple spacetimes). I think the paper should be published in your journal. I recommend its publication after the following points have been clarified. A) The structure of the induced energymomentum tensor is not discussed. In particular the violation of the weakenergy condition or dominant energy conditions produced by the metric of the type (33). B) What is the causal structure of the resulting spacetime? does this depend on the choice of the K_i? C) What is the explicit form of the resulting metric near r=0? (in particular it seems that the limiting curvature hypothesis by ref.3 is automatically satisfied in this case).
In fact in ref.16 the RG improvement was obtained by means of the properdistance of a freefalling observer along the radial geodesic. But the latter behaves as (the inverse) of the Coulomb component of the Weyl tensor. It seems to me that near the singularity all the RGimprovements are equivalent/universal. Can the author comment on this?
A minor note: the first use of eq.(3) in the context of RGimprovement has appeared in ref.[15], see in particular eq.(15), which is precisely eq.(3) of the paper. I would recommend to mention this in the main text. (note that the Petrov classification has been used, instead of the one presented in this work).