SciPost Submission Page
Complete set of quasi-conserved quantities for spinning particles around Kerr
by Geoffrey Compère, Adrien Druart
|As Contributors:||Geoffrey Compère · Adrien Druart|
|Arxiv Link:||https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12454v2 (pdf)|
|Date submitted:||2021-07-05 15:19|
|Submitted by:||Druart, Adrien|
|Submitted to:||SciPost Physics|
We revisit the conserved quantities of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Tulczyjew equations describing the motion of spinning particles on a fixed background. Assuming Ricci-flatness and the existence of a Killing-Yano tensor, we demonstrate that besides the two non-trivial quasi-conserved quantities, i.e. conserved at linear order in the spin, found by R\"udiger, non-trivial quasi-conserved quantities are in one-to-one correspondence with non-trivial mixed-symmetry Killing tensors. We prove that no such stationary and axisymmetric mixed-symmetry Killing tensor exists on the Kerr geometry. We discuss the implications for the motion of spinning particles on Kerr spacetime where the quasi-constants of motion are shown not to be in complete involution.
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2021-9-1 (Invited Report)
Authors ask on existence of linear on basic variables conserved quantities for Dixon spinning body in Kerr space, in addition to the energy and angular momentum. From general considerations, I am rather skeptical on existence of such quantities, so the kind of "negative report", presented by authors, is not surprising. Nevertheless, their analysis of Killing-Yano tensors is of interest, and the work can be published in SciPost Physics in the present form.
1. Author's explanation for their notion of quasi-conserved quantity on page 1 is rather confusing: "They are quasi-conserved in the sense
that they are no longer conserved at quadratic order in
the spin without further corrections".
I encourage authors to give the exact and clear definition of what they mean by "quasi-conserved" quantity.
Anonymous Report 1 on 2021-8-15 (Invited Report)
1. The article addresses a very important question.
2. The article performs a strong technical analysis.
3. The article is very well written.
The paper has no weaknesses.
This very interesting article studies conserved quantities for spinning particles in spaces admitting Killing-Yano tensors. Then the authors apply their general formalism to a particular case of the Kerr black hole, which gives the most interesting physical example of geometries with Killing-Yano tensors. The authors derive the restrictions on the spacetime that guarantee Liouville integrability of the equations of motion for spins, and they demonstrate that such restrictions are satisfied by the Kerr geometry. The article addresses a very important question in general relativity, and it is very well written, so I recommend it for publication.
I would recommend one addition that would be beneficial to the readers. The article reduces the criterion for integrability to existence of "mixed-symmetry Killing tensors", and they demonstrate that such objects don't exist for the Kerr geometry. It would be interesting to add a small section before VII with some examples of spaces with mixed-symmetry tensors and the resulting integrability. The examples can be as simple as flat space, but I think that they would provide an excellent illustration of the formalism. I leave this addition to the authors' discretion, and I recommend this paper for publication.
The proposed optional change is mentioned in the report.