SciPost Submission Page
BFKL phenomenology: resummation of high-energy logs in inclusive processes
by Francesco Giovanni Celiberto, Michael Fucilla, Dmitry Yu. Ivanov, Mohammed M. A. Mohammed, Alessandro Papa
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Francesco Giovanni Celiberto · Mohammed Maher Abdelrahim Mohammed · Alessandro Papa |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12649v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2021-10-26 06:07 |
| Submitted by: | Mohammed, Mohammed Maher Abdelrahim |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 50th International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics (ISMD2021) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
Abstract
We present recent phenomenological studies, tailored on kinematic configurations typical of current and forthcoming analyses at the LHC, for two novel probe channels of the BFKL resummation of energy logarithms. Particular attention is drawn to the behavior of distributions differential in azimuthal angle and rapidity, where significant high-energy effects are expected.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-1-28 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2110.12649v1, delivered 2022-01-28, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.4263
Report
This presents a clear and concise summary of the authors' interesting and novel study. It is certainly suitable for publication. There are a few small typographical suggestions below.
Requested changes
1) The grammar in the first sentence of the introduction needs modification. Possibly 'this' -> 'thus'?
2) The grammar in the first sentence of Section 2 needs modification. Possibly just starting with 'We present...'?
3) It seems that the variables are not completely consistent in (2,3) and the discussion. There are kappas in (2) and k's in (3) which I believe are both transverse momenta variables. It would be good to unify this.