Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Ultraheavy particle dark matter

by Daniel Carney, Nirmal Raj, Yang Bai, Joshua Berger, Carlos Blanco, Joseph Bramante, Christopher Cappiello, Maíra Dutra, Reza Ebadi, Kristi Engel, Edward Kolb, J. Patrick Harding, Jason Kumar, Gordan Krnjaic, Rafael F. Lang, Rebecca K. Leane, Benjamin V. Lehmann, Shengchao Li, Andrew J. Long, Gopolang Mohlabeng, Ibles Olcina, Elisa Pueschel, Nicholas L. Rodd, Carsten Rott, Dipan Sengupta, Bibhushan Shakya, Ronald L. Walsworth, Shawn Westerdale

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Nirmal Raj
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06508v2  (pdf)
Date accepted: Oct. 4, 2023
Date submitted: April 28, 2023, 6:07 a.m.
Submitted by: Raj, Nirmal
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Gravitation, Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Theoretical, Experimental, Computational, Phenomenological, Observational

Abstract

We outline the unique opportunities and challenges in the search for "ultraheavy" dark matter candidates with masses between roughly $10~{\rm TeV}$ and the Planck scale $m_{\rm pl} \approx 10^{16}~{\rm TeV}$. This mass range presents a wide and relatively unexplored dark matter parameter space, with a rich space of possible models and cosmic histories. We emphasize that both current detectors and new, targeted search techniques, via both direct and indirect detection, are poised to contribute to searches for ultraheavy particle dark matter in the coming decade. We highlight the need for new developments in this space, including new analyses of current and imminent direct and indirect experiments targeting ultraheavy dark matter and development of new, ultra-sensitive detector technologies like next-generation liquid noble detectors, neutrino experiments, and specialized quantum sensing techniques.

Author comments upon resubmission

This is a resubmission following addressal of the referee's comments.

List of changes

Dear editor,

We thank the referee for their positive appraisal of our white paper

and recommendation to publish. We also appreciate their valuable comments that we address below.


REFEREE

The detection sections focus on model-independent bounds on heavy dark matter, which looks decoupled from the production mechanism. Some discussion is given in the direct detection section but less in the indirection part. The paper could benefit greatly from more discussions on detecting ultra-heavy dark matter for several mechanisms presented in Sec 2.

OUR RESPONSE

We agree. The DM decay signatures we had discussed are agnostic to the exact cosmological production mechanism so long as particle DM (as opposed to PBHs, etc.) is produced.

Accordingly, we have now added to the introductory paragraph of the indirect detection section the following text.

"Ultraheavy DM models in this category may be generically produced in the early universe by a number of mechanisms discussed above, including freeze-out, freeze-in, gravitational production, and involving phase transitions."


REFEREE

The signatures of heavy dark matter models could also be detected by cosmological observations. The authors may consider adding some discussions on this.

OUR RESPONSE

We appreciate the suggestion. To the end of the indirect detection section we have added the following text.

"Finally, cosmological observations could also constrain ultraheavy DM. CMB anisotropies would carry imprints of DM scattering with SM matter, which may be exploited to probe a wide range of DM masses~cite{Dvorkin:2013cea,Gluscevic:2017ywp,Buen-Abad:2021mvc,Nguyen:2021cnb}. Moreover, ultraheavy DM produced gravitationally is accompanied by primordial non-Gaussianities that may be enhanced and observed in the CMB power spectrum~cite{Li:2019ves,Li:2020xwr}."


REFEREE

For gravitational particle production through inflation, the authors wrote that the production is efficient when dark matter mass is comparable to the inflationary Hubble scale. But I think the production is efficient when the mass is much smaller than the Hubble scale.

OUR RESPONSE

As we had noted, there may be exceptions, however gravitational production as in WIMPzilla models is indeed generically most efficient when the particle mass is comparable to the Hubble scale at the end of inflation. This is stated, e.g., at the end of page 1 in https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9802238.


With these changes we hope our manuscript will now be taken up for publication.

Published as SciPost Phys. Core 6, 075 (2023)

Login to report or comment